[PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: introduce property mbox-rx-timeout-ms

Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla at arm.com
Thu Jul 4 03:36:36 PDT 2024


On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:17:14AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> 
> System Controller Management Interface(SCMI) firmwares might have
> different designs by SCMI firmware developers. So the maximum receive
> channel timeout value might also varies in the various designs.
> 
> So introduce property mbox-rx-timeout-ms to let each platform could
> set its own timeout value in device tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V2:
>  Drop defaults, update description.
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index ebf384e76df1..dcac0b36c76f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ properties:
>        atomic mode of operation, even if requested.
>      default: 0
>  
> +  max-rx-timeout-ms:
> +    description:
> +      An optional time value, expressed in milliseconds, representing the
> +      mailbox maximum timeout value for receive channel. The value should
> +      be a non-zero value if set.
> +

IIRC, you had the min and max constraint in the earlier response. You
need to have rushed and posted another version before I could respond
with my preference.

So there is no rush, these are v6.12 material. Take time for respining
and give some time for the review.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list