[PATCH v6 0/6] Add IOMMUFD dirty tracking support for SMMUv3

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 7:46 PM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>
> Cc: iommu at lists.linux.dev; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> robin.murphy at arm.com; joro at 8bytes.org; jgg at nvidia.com;
> ryan.roberts at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com; kevin.tian at intel.com;
> nicolinc at nvidia.com; mshavit at google.com; eric.auger at redhat.com;
> joao.m.martins at oracle.com; jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun at huawei.com>;
> zhukeqian <zhukeqian1 at huawei.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm at huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add IOMMUFD dirty tracking support for
> SMMUv3
> 
> Hey Shameer,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > v5 --> v6
> >  -Minor updates based on Nicolin's feedback.
> >  -Picked up R-by tags by Jason, Nicolin and Kevin(Thanks!)
> >
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > Not sure you got a chance to take a look at this series yet. Hopefully
> > this will make it for 6.11
> 
> This all looks good to me, thanks.
> 
> However, it conflicts with some of Jason's stuff that I've pushed out to
> for-joerg/smmu/updates:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=for-
> joerg/arm-smmu/updates
> 
> Please can you rebase, retest and repost? Hopefully it makes your life
> even easier as, for example, I don't think you need the first patch at
> all anymore thanks to "iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make SVA allocate a normal
> arm_smmu_domain".

Done. Please see the v7 send out just now.

Thanks,
Shameer