[shawnguo:imx/dt64 53/91] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']

[Philip Li]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:50:38PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:22:26AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > > match
> > > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> > > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > > match
> > > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: scmi:
> > > protocol at 19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> > > ('regusdhc2vmmcgrp', 'uart1grp', 'usdhc1-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc1-
> > > 200mhzgrp', 'usdhc1grp', 'usdhc2-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc2-200mhzgrp',
> > > 'usdhc2gpiogrp', 'usdhc2grp' were unexpected)
> > 
> > The binding is in Linus' pinctrl tree.
> 
> Hi lkp forks,
> 
> Thanks for all those reports!  But could you stop such "make W=1 dtbs"
> testing against my imx/dt64 (and imx/dt) branch but testing linux-next
> instead?  Binding changes may go via different trees.

Got it, these 2 branches will be ignored for dtbs testing. Sorry for
the noises.

> 
> Shawn
> 
>