Mainline: v6.10-rc6 boot failed across all arm64 devices

Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju at linaro.org
Mon Jul 1 06:42:48 PDT 2024


Hi Will,

On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 18:17, Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> This report is quite hard to follow, so just some minor comments which
> you can hopefully take on board to improve things in future:
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 05:28:29PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The mainline kernel v6.10-rc6 boot failed across all arm64 devices and
> > qemu-arm64 and no crash log found (earlycon) did not help.
> >
> > But the defconfig builds boot PASS.
> >
> > The boot problem is with defconfig + Extra Kconfigs and builds links
> > provided in the bottom of this email.
>
> If I go to the bottom of the email, I see this:
>
> > Links:
> > -----
> >  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2idWrbdtwMqpD9wx7IPRGJ7Dsx3/
> >  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2idWrYDposdlRsS4jwF916a0qGE/
> >  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.10-rc6/testrun/24473346/suite/boot/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod/history/
> >  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.10-rc6/testrun/24473903/suite/boot/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture/history/
>
> but these are just random links without any context. The first two appear
> to be kernel build artifacts, but I can't tell:
>
>   - Are both "good" or "bad"?

Both are bad. which failed to boot from these build artifacts.
Which is the location of storage of Build artifacts and build logs,
Image, Vmlinux.

>   - What is the difference between them?
 one build is pointing to Rcu Torture test build,
  - CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m ++Kconfigs

other one is pointing to libgpiod build,
  - CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y ++Kconfigs

>
> If I look at the first of the last two links, click through to the
> "qemu-arm64" target and follow the "job_url" link, then I end up at:
>
>   https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2idWuAb51mcz7lO1BAj8Aw0BrNY
>
> which has some empty logs and something from "TuxRun" which says:
>
>   {"error": "File not found"}

Due to missing boot log this file is empty.

>
> It's very hard to know what to do with this :/


Sorry for the trouble.
I will add more detailed information next to each link in my next report.

>
> Will

- Naresh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list