[PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: Drop interrupts property from pwm-rockchip nodes

Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Mon Jan 29 03:32:02 PST 2024


The binding doesn't define interrupts and adding such a definition was
refused because it's unclear how they should ever be used and the
relevant registers are outside the PWM range. So drop them fixing
several dtbs_check warnings like:

	arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108-elgin-r1.dtb: pwm at 10280030: 'interrupts' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml#

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,

after I sent
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/20240106142654.1262758-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
the feedback in that thread and on irc was that instead of adding the
interrupts to the binding the right way to get rid of the warnings is to
drop the interrupt properties instead. This is implemented here.

Best regards
Uwe

 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108.dtsi | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108.dtsi
index abf3006f0a84..f3291f3bbc6f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1108.dtsi
@@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ spi: spi at 10270000 {
 	pwm4: pwm at 10280000 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x10280000 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM>, <&cru PCLK_PWM>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -208,7 +207,6 @@ pwm4: pwm at 10280000 {
 	pwm5: pwm at 10280010 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x10280010 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM>, <&cru PCLK_PWM>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -220,7 +218,6 @@ pwm5: pwm at 10280010 {
 	pwm6: pwm at 10280020 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x10280020 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM>, <&cru PCLK_PWM>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -232,7 +229,6 @@ pwm6: pwm at 10280020 {
 	pwm7: pwm at 10280030 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x10280030 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM>, <&cru PCLK_PWM>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -386,7 +382,6 @@ i2c0: i2c at 20000000 {
 	pwm0: pwm at 20040000 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x20040000 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM0_PMU>, <&cru PCLK_PWM0_PMU>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -398,7 +393,6 @@ pwm0: pwm at 20040000 {
 	pwm1: pwm at 20040010 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x20040010 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM0_PMU>, <&cru PCLK_PWM0_PMU>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -410,7 +404,6 @@ pwm1: pwm at 20040010 {
 	pwm2: pwm at 20040020 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x20040020 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM0_PMU>, <&cru PCLK_PWM0_PMU>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -422,7 +415,6 @@ pwm2: pwm at 20040020 {
 	pwm3: pwm at 20040030 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm";
 		reg = <0x20040030 0x10>;
-		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks = <&cru SCLK_PWM0_PMU>, <&cru PCLK_PWM0_PMU>;
 		clock-names = "pwm", "pclk";
 		pinctrl-names = "default";

base-commit: 596764183be8ebb13352b281a442a1f1151c9b06
-- 
2.43.0




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list