[PATCH V3 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for ECMDQ register mode
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Tue Apr 30 08:09:50 PDT 2024
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:41:50AM -0700, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
> Resending the patches by Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen at huawei.com> that add
> support for SMMU ECMDQ feature.
>
> Tested this feature on a Marvell SoC by implementing a smmu-test driver.
> This test driver spawns a thread per CPU and each thread keeps sending
> map, table-walk and unmap requests for a fixed duration.
>
> Using this test driver, we compared ECMDQ vs SMMU with software batching
> support and saw ~5% improvement with ECMDQ. Performance numbers are
> mentioned below:
>
> Total Requests Average Requests Difference
> Per CPU wrt ECMDQ
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ECMDQ 239286381 2991079
> CMDQ Batch Size 1 228232187 2852902 -4.62%
> CMDQ Batch Size 32 233465784 2918322 -2.43%
> CMDQ Batch Size 64 231679588 2895994 -3.18%
> CMDQ Batch Size 128 233189030 2914862 -2.55%
> CMDQ Batch Size 256 230965773 2887072 -3.48%
These are pretty small improvements in a targetted micro-benchmark. Do
you have any real-world numbers showing that this is worthwhile? For
example, running something like netperf.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list