[PATCH v8 05/16] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper
Jonathan Cameron
Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com
Tue Apr 30 04:07:14 PDT 2024
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:26:06 +1000
Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 4/26/24 23:51, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > If CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR provide a helper to retrieve the
> > acpi_handle for a given CPU allowing access to methods
> > in DSDT.
> >
> > Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis at oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v8: Code simplification suggested by Rafael.
> > Fixup ;; spotted by Gavin
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
>
Thanks,
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > index 3b180e21f325..ecc2721fecae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,17 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
> > struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(errata);
> >
> > +acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_processor *pr;
> > +
> > + pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> > + if (pr)
> > + return pr->handle;
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Maybe it's worthy to have more check here, something like below.
> However, it's also fine without the extra check.
We could harden this, but for now the call sites are only
int arch_(un)register_cpu() so if we get there with either
of these failing something went very wrong.
Maybe if it gets used more widely this defense would be wise.
Jonathan
>
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_possible(cpu))
> return NULL;
>
> > static int acpi_processor_errata_piix4(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > u8 value1 = 0;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index 34829f2c517a..9844a3f9c4e5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -309,6 +309,8 @@ int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id,
> > int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu);
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> >
> > +acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu);
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_IOAPIC
> > int acpi_get_ioapic_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base, u64 *phys_addr);
> > #endif
> > @@ -1077,6 +1079,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_sleep_state_supported(u8 sleep_state)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > extern void arch_post_acpi_subsys_init(void);
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list