[PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Add initial support for Blaize BLZP1600 CB2

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 25/04/2024 12:41, Nikolaos Pasaloukos wrote:
>>> +
>>> +	soc {
>>
>> This does not cause dtbs_check W=1 warnings? Surprising a bit... This
>> should cause big fat warning, so I have doubts patchset was tested.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> No it doesn't cause any warnings. I did:
> make arch=arm64 dt_binding_check
> make arch=arm64 dtbs_check W=1
> I don't get any warnings. Could you please let me know what kind of
> warning I should get? Am I doing something wrong and I don't get
> the warning?

I was expecting one for missing soc unit address, but you are right -
your ranges are empty, so "soc" is ok. I keep forgetting that
distinction. Looks fine then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof