[PATCH 2/7] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: use exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle() for PMU regs
Peter Griffin
peter.griffin at linaro.org
Thu Apr 25 03:02:45 PDT 2024
Hi Krzysztof,
+ Arnd & Lee (syscon maintainers)
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 08:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 23/04/2024 19:06, André Draszik wrote:
> > Some Exynos based SoCs like Tensor gs101 protect the PMU registers for
> > security hardening reasons so that they are only write accessible in
> > EL3 via an SMC call.
> >
> > The Exynos PMU driver handles this transparently when using
> > exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle().
> >
> > Switch to using that API to support such SoCs. As this driver now no
> > longer depends on mfd syscon remove that header and Kconfig dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig | 1 -
> > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> > index f10afa3d7ff5..bb63fa710803 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
> > @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
> > depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > depends on USB_DWC3_EXYNOS
> > select GENERIC_PHY
> > - select MFD_SYSCON
> > default y
> > help
> > Enable USB DRD PHY support for Exynos 5 SoC series.
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > index 04171eed5b16..ac208b89f5a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > -#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h>
> > #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h>
>
> This is getting out of hand: shall we expect to convert all the drivers
> from generic syscon to Exynos-specific API?
I think certainly for the various exynos phy (usb, ufs, pcie, mipi)
this change is required. I can do some more checking to see what other
drivers are twiddling PMU bits downstream.
> What if one driver is some
> shared IP, like DWC USB3 controller?
>
> I already commented on Google hwrng driver:
I think you mean syscon-poweroff but I get your point. The
syscon-reboot / poweroff / reboot-mode drivers are examples of drivers
where we may wish to use them, but today we can't as they are using
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() API.
> I prefer to keep the syscon
> API and change the syscon driver to expose proper regmap. IOW, use
> generic API syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() and the type of regmap
> returned is defined by the provider (so node pointed by phandle).
>
@Arnd - any more thoughts on Krzysztof idea above ^^
@Krzysztof - I did speak to Arnd about the idea you proposed (or my
understanding of it at least), which was external drivers like
exynos-pmu or altera-sysmgr.c could create the regmap and register it
with syscon so it can be returned by
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(). Arnd's initial feedback was he
would prefer to keep the complexity out of syscon, and have the client
driver support multiple backends (so syscon-reboot for example would
support using either syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() or
exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle() to obtain it's regmap). There were
also some concerns about syscon having to probe very early for some
platforms.
Thanks,
Peter.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list