[PATCH v2 03/14] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos-ufs: Add gs101 compatible
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Wed Apr 24 12:53:18 PDT 2024
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Add dedicated google,gs101-ufs compatible for Google Tensor gs101
> SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin at linaro.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml | 38 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> index b2b509b3944d..1179527d29d1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> @@ -12,12 +12,10 @@ maintainers:
> description: |
> Each Samsung UFS host controller instance should have its own node.
>
> -allOf:
> - - $ref: ufs-common.yaml
> -
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> + - google,gs101-ufs
> - samsung,exynos7-ufs
> - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs
> - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-vh
> @@ -38,14 +36,24 @@ properties:
> - const: ufsp
>
> clocks:
> + minItems: 2
> items:
> - description: ufs link core clock
> - description: unipro main clock
> + - description: fmp clock
> + - description: ufs aclk clock
> + - description: ufs pclk clock
> + - description: sysreg clock
>
> clock-names:
> + minItems: 2
> items:
> - const: core_clk
> - const: sclk_unipro_main
> + - const: fmp
> + - const: ufs_aclk
> + - const: ufs_pclk
'ufs_' is redundant.
> + - const: sysreg
>
> phys:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -72,6 +80,30 @@ required:
> - clocks
> - clock-names
>
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: ufs-common.yaml
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: google,gs101-ufs
> +
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 6
> +
> + clock-names:
> + minItems: 6
> +
> + else:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + clock-names:
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> examples:
> --
> 2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list