[PATCH v2 2/6] iio: light: stk3310: Implement vdd supply and power it off during suspend
Andy Shevchenko
andy.shevchenko at gmail.com
Wed Apr 24 10:31:27 PDT 2024
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 7:14 PM Ondřej Jirman <megi at xff.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:20:41PM GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:59 PM Ondřej Jirman <megi at xff.cz> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:16:06AM GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:41 AM Aren Moynihan <aren at peacevolution.org> wrote:
...
> > > > > ret = stk3310_init(indio_dev);
> > > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > > - return ret;
> > > > > + goto err_vdd_disable;
> > > >
> > > > This is wrong. You will have the regulator being disabled _before_
> > > > IRQ. Note, that the original code likely has a bug which sets states
> > > > before disabling IRQ and removing a handler.
> > >
> > > How so? stk3310_init is called before enabling the interrupt.
> >
> > Exactly, IRQ is registered with devm and hence the error path and
> > remove stages will got it in a wrong order.
>
> Makes no sense.
Huh?!
> IRQ is not enabled here, yet. So in error path, the code will
> just disable the regulator and devm will unref it later on. IRQ doesn't enter
> the picture here at all in the error path.
Error path _after_ IRQ handler has been _successfully_ installed.
And complete ->remove() stage.
> > > Original code has a bug that IRQ is enabled before registering the
> > > IIO device,
> >
> > Indeed, but this is another bug.
> >
> > > so if IRQ is triggered before registration, iio_push_event
> > > from IRQ handler may be called on a not yet registered IIO device.
> > >
> > > Never saw it happen, though. :)
> >
> > Because nobody cares enough to enable DEBUG_SHIRQ.
>
> Nice debug tool. I bet it makes quite a mess when enabled. :)
FWIW, I have had it enabled for ages, but I have only a few devices,
so I fixed a few cases in the past WRT shared IRQ issues.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list