[PATCH v4 01/15] KVM: arm64: Harden __ctxt_sys_reg() against out-of-range values
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Fri Apr 19 03:29:21 PDT 2024
The unsuspecting kernel tinkerer can be easily confused into
writing something that looks like this:
ikey.lo = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1);
which seems vaguely sensible, until you realise that the second
parameter is the encoding of a sysreg, and not the index into
the vcpu sysreg file... Debugging what happens in this case is
an interesting exercise in head<->wall interactions.
As they often say: "Any resemblance to actual persons, living
or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental".
In order to save people's time, add some compile-time hardening
that will at least weed out the "stupidly out of range" values.
This will *not* catch anything that isn't a compile-time constant.
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 9e8a496fb284..e24bd876ec9a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
* Don't bother with VNCR-based accesses in the nVHE code, it has no
* business dealing with NV.
*/
-static inline u64 *__ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
+static inline u64 *___ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
{
#if !defined (__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__)
if (unlikely(cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT) &&
@@ -906,6 +906,13 @@ static inline u64 *__ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
return (u64 *)&ctxt->sys_regs[r];
}
+#define __ctxt_sys_reg(c,r) \
+ ({ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(r) && \
+ (r) >= NR_SYS_REGS); \
+ ___ctxt_sys_reg(c, r); \
+ })
+
#define ctxt_sys_reg(c,r) (*__ctxt_sys_reg(c,r))
u64 kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *, enum vcpu_sysreg);
--
2.39.2
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list