[PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/04/2024 15:50, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 03:29:26PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/04/2024 12:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> + Greg
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 30/03/2024 18:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 30/03/2024 18:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:23:30 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> Merging
>>>>>> =======
>>>>>> All further patches depend on the first amba patch, therefore please ack
>>>>>> and this should go via one tree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Description
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>> Modules registering driver with amba_driver_register() often forget to
>>>>>> set .owner field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> [01/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()
>>>>>          (no commit info)
>>>>
>>>> Patchset applied here:
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-dt.git/log/?h=for-v6.10/module-owner-amba
>>>
>>> How do you plan to push this ? Given this affects most of the drivers/, 
>>> do you plan to send this to Greg ? We have changes in the coresight
>>> tree that would conflict with this "tag" ( I haven't merged them yet, 
>>> but is in my local queue). I want to make sure we can avoid the
>>> conflicts. I am happy to merge this to my local tree and base the
>>> changes on this, if this is going in for v6.10 and all are in agreement.
>>
>> I pushed it to arm-linux patches but it hasn't been picked up.
>>
>> I propose you take entire set then.
> 
> You are again being, IMHO, abrasive with your attitude. So far, every
> interaction with you has been abrasive and bordering on abusive.
> 
> You haven't asked me whether I will take them. I will - just not at the
> moment because 

Thanks for confirming, I wanted to ping you because there was no feedback.

Can you provide stable tag for coresight tree?

Best regards,
Krzysztof