[PATCH 5/6] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add BCM2712 support

Florian Fainelli florian.fainelli at broadcom.com
Sun Apr 14 08:53:32 PDT 2024



On 4/13/2024 3:14 PM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> SD capabilities of this chipset.
> The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> include that feature yet.
> Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta at suse.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 130 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 9053526fa212..907a4947abe5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   #include <linux/bitops.h>
>   #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>   
>   #include "sdhci-cqhci.h"
>   #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
> @@ -30,15 +32,31 @@
>   
>   #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
>   
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL			0x44
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_MASK		0x3
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_SD			BIT(1)
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_MMC		BIT(0)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
> +#define  SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> +
>   struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>   	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
>   	unsigned int flags;
>   	struct clk *base_clk;
>   	u32 base_freq_hz;
> +	struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
> +	struct pinctrl_state *pins_default;
>   };
>   
>   struct brcmstb_match_priv {
>   	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
>   	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
>   	const unsigned int flags;
>   };
> @@ -124,6 +142,42 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>   	writel(reg, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_VENDOR);
>   }
>   
> +static void sdhci_bcm2712_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> +{
> +	u16 clk;
> +	u32 reg;
> +	bool is_emmc_rate = false;
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);

Reverse christmas tree declaration please, longest lines first and 
shortest lines next.

> +
> +	host->mmc->actual_clock = 0;
> +
> +	sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> +	switch (host->mmc->ios.timing) {
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52:
> +	case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS:
> +	is_emmc_rate = true;
> +	break;

Both lines are mis-aligned and requiren an additional tab.

> +	}
> +
> +	reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL);
> +	reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_MASK;
> +	if (is_emmc_rate)
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_MMC;
> +	else
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL_SD;
> +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_SD_PIN_SEL);
> +
> +	if (clock == 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	clk = sdhci_calc_clk(host, clock, &host->mmc->actual_clock);
> +	sdhci_enable_clk(host, clk);
> +}
> +
>   static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>   {
>   	u16 clk;
> @@ -139,6 +193,17 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>   	sdhci_enable_clk(host, clk);
>   }
>   
> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode,
> +				  unsigned short vdd)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vmmc)) {
> +		struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> +
> +		mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, vdd);
> +	}
> +	sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd);
> +}
> +
>   static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
>   					    unsigned int timing)
>   {
> @@ -168,6 +233,36 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
>   	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>   }
>   
> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +	u32 uhs_mask = (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104);
> +	u32 hsemmc_mask = (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR |
> +			   MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_8V | MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_2V);
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	/*
> +	* If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> +	* then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> +	*/
> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & uhs_mask) || (host->mmc->caps2 & hsemmc_mask)) {
> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> +		/* Force presence */
> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>   {
>   	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> @@ -200,6 +295,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
>   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>   };
>   
> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> +	.set_clock = sdhci_bcm2712_set_clock,
> +	.set_power = sdhci_brcmstb_set_power,
> +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
> +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> +};
> +
>   static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
>   	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
>   	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> @@ -237,7 +340,13 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
>   	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0,
>   };
>   
> +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> @@ -314,11 +423,16 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *priv;
>   	u32 actual_clock_mhz;
>   	struct sdhci_host *host;
> +	bool no_pinctrl = false;
>   	struct clk *clk;
>   	struct clk *base_clk = NULL;
>   	int res;
>   
>   	match = of_match_node(sdhci_brcm_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> +	if (!match) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to get matching of_match struct\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>   	match_priv = match->data;
>   
>   	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probe found match for %s\n",  match->compatible);
> @@ -354,6 +468,19 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (res)
>   		goto err;
>   
> +	priv->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->pinctrl)) {
> +			no_pinctrl = true;

One too many tabs here.

> +	}
> +	priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl, "default");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->pins_default)) {
> +			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "No pinctrl default state\n");
> +			no_pinctrl = true;

One too many tabs here.

Please just run checkpatch on your patches, thanks.
-- 
Florian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4221 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240414/bfebbcdf/attachment-0001.p7s>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list