[PATCH 1/4] KVM: delete .change_pte MMU notifier callback
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Fri Apr 12 03:44:09 PDT 2024
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index dc04bc767865..ff17849be9f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1768,40 +1768,6 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> return false;
> }
>
> -bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> -{
> - kvm_pfn_t pfn = pte_pfn(range->arg.pte);
> -
> - if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt)
> - return false;
> -
> - WARN_ON(range->end - range->start != 1);
> -
> - /*
> - * If the page isn't tagged, defer to user_mem_abort() for sanitising
> - * the MTE tags. The S2 pte should have been unmapped by
> - * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end().
> - */
> - if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !page_mte_tagged(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
> - return false;
> -
> - /*
> - * We've moved a page around, probably through CoW, so let's treat
> - * it just like a translation fault and the map handler will clean
> - * the cache to the PoC.
> - *
> - * The MMU notifiers will have unmapped a huge PMD before calling
> - * ->change_pte() (which in turn calls kvm_set_spte_gfn()) and
> - * therefore we never need to clear out a huge PMD through this
> - * calling path and a memcache is not required.
> - */
> - kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(kvm->arch.mmu.pgt, range->start << PAGE_SHIFT,
> - PAGE_SIZE, __pfn_to_phys(pfn),
> - KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R, NULL, 0);
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> u64 size = (range->end - range->start) << PAGE_SHIFT;
Thanks. It's nice to see this code retire:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
Also, if you're in the business of hacking the MMU notifier code, it
would be really great to change the .clear_flush_young() callback so
that the architecture could handle the TLB invalidation. At the moment,
the core KVM code invalidates the whole VMID courtesy of 'flush_on_ret'
being set by kvm_handle_hva_range(), whereas we could do a much
lighter-weight and targetted TLBI in the architecture page-table code
when we actually update the ptes for small ranges.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list