[PATCH v14 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Wed Apr 10 09:59:40 PDT 2024
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 01:53:14PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> ZynqMP TCM information was fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
> is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
> as per new bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah at amd.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v14:
> - Add Versal platform support
> - Add Versal-NET platform support
> - Maintain backward compatibility for ZynqMP platform and use hardcode
> TCM addresses
> - Configure TCM based on xlnx,tcm-mode property for Versal
> - Avoid TCM configuration if that property isn't available in DT
>
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 0f942440b4e2..504492f930ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ struct mbox_info {
> };
>
> /*
> - * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are
> - * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel
> + * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will stay in driver to maintain backward
> + * compatibility with device-tree that does not have TCM information.
> */
> static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = {
> {0xffe00000UL, 0x0, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> @@ -300,36 +300,6 @@ static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> dev_warn(dev, "failed to send message\n");
> }
>
> -/*
> - * zynqmp_r5_set_mode()
> - *
> - * set RPU cluster and TCM operation mode
> - *
> - * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
> - * @fw_reg_val: value expected by firmware to configure RPU cluster mode
> - * @tcm_mode: value expected by fw to configure TCM mode (lockstep or split)
> - *
> - * Return: 0 for success and < 0 for failure
> - */
> -static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
> - enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
> - enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start()
> * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> @@ -761,6 +731,103 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> +{
> + int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret, tcm_pd_idx, pd_count;
> + struct of_phandle_args out_args;
> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> + struct platform_device *cpdev;
> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct resource *res;
> + u64 abs_addr, size;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> + dev = r5_core->dev;
> + np = r5_core->np;
> +
> + pd_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
> + "#power-domain-cells");
> +
> + if (pd_count <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid power-domains property, %d\n", pd_count);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* First entry in power-domains list is for r5 core, rest for TCM. */
> + tcm_bank_count = pd_count - 1;
> +
> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM count %d\n", tcm_bank_count);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> + for (j = 0, tcm_pd_idx = 1; j < tcm_bank_count; j++, tcm_pd_idx++) {
> + tcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tcm)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] = tcm;
> +
> + /* Get power-domains id of TCM. */
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
> + "#power-domain-cells",
> + tcm_pd_idx, &out_args);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
> + "failed to get tcm %d pm domain, ret %d\n",
> + tcm_pd_idx, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + tcm->pm_domain_id = out_args.args[0];
> + of_node_put(out_args.np);
> +
> + /* Get TCM address without translation. */
> + ret = of_property_read_reg(np, j, &abs_addr, &size);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Remote processor can address only 32 bits
> + * so convert 64-bits into 32-bits. This will discard
> + * any unwanted upper 32-bits.
> + */
> + tcm->da = (u32)abs_addr;
> + tcm->size = (u32)size;
> +
> + cpdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + res = platform_get_resource(cpdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, j);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get tcm resource\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tcm->addr = (u32)res->start;
> + tcm->bank_name = (char *)res->name;
> + res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, tcm->addr, tcm->size,
> + tcm->bank_name);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request tcm resource\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> @@ -839,9 +906,16 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> int ret, i;
>
> - ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
> +
> + /* Maintain backward compatibility for zynqmp by using hardcode TCM address. */
> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss"))
The previous patch moved the definition of the R5FSS to the new bindings but
this is forcing to use the old bindings - did I something?
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> + else
> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm, err %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -856,12 +930,18 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
> - cluster->mode, ret);
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss") ||
> + of_find_property(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -906,16 +986,25 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
> */
> if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
> - tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
> - tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> } else {
> dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss")) {
> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
> + else
> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> + } else if (of_find_property(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", (u32 *)&tcm_mode);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
> * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
> @@ -1100,6 +1189,8 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Match table for OF platform binding */
> static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-r5fss", },
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-net-r52fss", },
> { /* end of list */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list