[PATCH v10 2/4] dt-bindings: stm32: update DT bingding for stm32mp25

[Gabriel FERNANDEZ]

On 4/10/24 09:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 19:12, gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
>>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT bindings". (plus a
> typo...) The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are
> bindings.
> See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
> Subject: Everything is an update. Be specific.
ok
>
>> RCC driver uses '.index' to define all parent clocks instead '.names'
>> because the use of a name to define a parent clock is prohibited.
>> This is ABI change, but the RCC driver has not yet merged, unlike all
>> others drivers besides Linux.
>>
>> Fixes: b5be49db3d47 ("dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform")
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v10:
>>    - cosmetic change (add change blank line)
>>    - rename USB2 into USBH to be compliant with last Reference Manuel
>>
>> Changes in v9:
>>    - Update DT binding documentation according S.Boyd remarks on RCC driver:
>>      Don't use '.name' to define a parent but use '.index'
>>      Then:
>>        - remove 'clock-names' property
>>        - Add description of all parent clocks used in RCC driver
>>
>>    v9 was Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> Please avoid putting full acks somewhere in the changelog. You confuse
> people's filters and maybe tooling as well. "v9 was Acked-by Conor
> Dooley", so a proper sentence, not "fake" ack, would work for everyone.
>
>
> With fixes in the subject:
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>

Thank's

Best regards

Gabriel


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>