[PATCH v1 0/6] SiFive cache controller PMU drivers

Conor Dooley conor at kernel.org
Tue Apr 9 08:01:15 PDT 2024


On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:05:04AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:08:12PM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote:
> 
> > All three of these cache controllers (with PMUs) have been integrated in
> > SoCs by our customers. However, as none of those SoCs have been publicly
> > announced yet, I cannot include SoC-specific compatible strings in this
> > version of the devicetree bindings.
> 
> And I don't want to apply any of those dt-binding patches until then.
> Stuff like "sifive,perfmon-counters" seems like a property that would
> go away with a device-specific compatible, at least for the ccache.

Reading the P550 stuff today reminded me that I had not got around to
looking at this series again. You should be able to use that to satisfy
my wish for some soc-specific compatibles, right?

And w.r.r. the perfmon-counters property, looked to me like Rob was
proposing it not even having to be vendor specific.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240409/101e198b/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list