[PATCH v2 0/4] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation

David Hildenbrand david at redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 04:29:31 PDT 2024


On 09.04.24 13:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.04.24 12:13, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 9, 2024, at 19:04, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/04/2024 01:10, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 8, 2024, at 16:30, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/04/2024 11:31, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 09:32:34AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Itaru,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/04/2024 08:39, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It turns out that creating the linear map can take a significant proportion of
>>>>>>>>> the total boot time, especially when rodata=full. And most of the time is spent
>>>>>>>>> waiting on superfluous tlb invalidation and memory barriers. This series reworks
>>>>>>>>> the kernel pgtable generation code to significantly reduce the number of those
>>>>>>>>> TLBIs, ISBs and DSBs. See each patch for details.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The below shows the execution time of map_mem() across a couple of different
>>>>>>>>> systems with different RAM configurations. We measure after applying each patch
>>>>>>>>> and show the improvement relative to base (v6.9-rc2):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                  | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra
>>>>>>>>>                  | VM, 16G     | VM, 64G     | VM, 256G    | Metal, 512G
>>>>>>>>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>>>>>>>>>                  |   ms    (%) |   ms    (%) |   ms    (%) |    ms    (%)
>>>>>>>>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>>>>>>>>> base           |  153   (0%) | 2227   (0%) | 8798   (0%) | 17442   (0%)
>>>>>>>>> no-cont-remap  |   77 (-49%) |  431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) |  3796 (-78%)
>>>>>>>>> batch-barriers |   13 (-92%) |  162 (-93%) |  655 (-93%) |  1656 (-91%)
>>>>>>>>> no-alloc-remap |   11 (-93%) |  109 (-95%) |  449 (-95%) |  1257 (-93%)
>>>>>>>>> lazy-unmap     |    6 (-96%) |   61 (-97%) |  257 (-97%) |   838 (-95%)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This series applies on top of v6.9-rc2. All mm selftests pass. I've compile and
>>>>>>>>> boot tested various PAGE_SIZE and VA size configs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Changes since v1 [1]
>>>>>>>>> ====================
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     - Added Tested-by tags (thanks to Eric and Itaru)
>>>>>>>>>     - Renamed ___set_pte() -> __set_pte_nosync() (per Ard)
>>>>>>>>>     - Reordered patches (biggest impact & least controversial first)
>>>>>>>>>     - Reordered alloc/map/unmap functions in mmu.c to aid reader
>>>>>>>>>     - pte_clear() -> __pte_clear() in clear_fixmap_nosync()
>>>>>>>>>     - Reverted generic p4d_index() which caused x86 build error. Replaced with
>>>>>>>>>       unconditional p4d_index() define under arm64.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240326101448.3453626-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240326101448.3453626-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ryan Roberts (4):
>>>>>>>>>     arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block
>>>>>>>>>     arm64: mm: Batch dsb and isb when populating pgtables
>>>>>>>>>     arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate
>>>>>>>>>     arm64: mm: Lazily clear pte table mappings from fixmap
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/fixmap.h  |   5 +-
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h     |   8 +
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  13 +-
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c   |  10 +-
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/fixmap.c           |  11 +
>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c              | 377 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>>>>>> 6 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've build and boot tested the v2 on FVP, base is taken from your
>>>>>>>> linux-rr repo. Running run_vmtests.sh on v2 left some gup longterm not oks, would you take a look at it? The mm ksefltests used is from your linux-rr repo too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for taking a look at this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't reproduce your issue unfortunately; steps as follows on Apple M2 VM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Config: arm64 defconfig + the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # Squashfs for snaps, xfs for large file folios.
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_LZ4
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_LZO
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_XZ
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_ZSTD
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_XFS_FS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # For general mm debug.
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # For mm selftests.
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC
>>>>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_GUP_TEST
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running on VM with 12G memory, split across 2 (emulated) NUMA nodes (needed by
>>>>>>> some mm selftests), with kernel command line to reserve hugetlbs and other
>>>>>>> features required by some mm selftests:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>> transparent_hugepage=madvise earlycon root=/dev/vda2 secretmem.enable
>>>>>>> hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:2,1:2 hugepagesz=32M hugepages=0:2,1:2
>>>>>>> default_hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:64,1:64 hugepagesz=64K hugepages=0:2,1:2
>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ubuntu userspace running off XFS rootfs. Build and run mm selftests from same
>>>>>>> git tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Although I don't think any of this config should make a difference to gup_longterm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like your errors are all "ftruncate() failed". I've seen this problem on
>>>>>>> our CI system. There it is due to running the tests from NFS file system. What
>>>>>>> filesystem are you using? Perhaps you are sharing into the FVP using 9p? That
>>>>>>> might also be problematic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was it. This time I booted up the kernel including your series on
>>>>>> QEMU on my M1 and executed the gup_longterm program without the ftruncate
>>>>>> failures. When testing your kernel on FVP, I was executing the script from the FVP's host filesystem using 9p.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure exactly what the root cause is. Perhaps there isn't enough space on
>>>>> the disk? It might be worth enhancing the error log to provide the errno in
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the strace’d gup_longterm executiong log on your
>>>> pgtable-boot-speedup-v2 kernel.
>>>
>>> Sorry are you saying that it only fails with the pgtable-boot-speedup-v2 patch
>>> set applied? I thought we previously concluded that it was independent of that?
>>> I was under the impression that it was filesystem related and not something that
>>> I was planning to investigate.
>>
>> No, irrespective of the kernel, if using 9p on FVP the test program fails.
>> It is indeed 9p filesystem related, as I switched to using NFS all the issues are gone.
> 
> Did it never work on 9p? If so, we might have to SKIP that test.
> 
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "gup_longterm.c_tmpfile_BLboOt", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0600) = 3
> unlinkat(AT_FDCWD, "gup_longterm.c_tmpfile_BLboOt", 0) = 0
> fstatfs(3, 0xffffe505a840)              = -1 EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not supported)
> ftruncate(3, 4096)                      = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

Note: I'm wondering if the unlinkat here is the problem that makes 
ftruncate() with 9p result in weird errors (e.g., the hypervisor 
unlinked the file and cannot reopen it for the fstatfs/ftruncate. ... 
which gives us weird errors here).

Then, we should lookup the fs type in run_with_local_tmpfile() before 
the unlink() and simply skip the test if it is 9p.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list