[PATCH] arm64: dts: meson: fix S4 power-controller node

[Martin Blumenstingl]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:26 AM Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
<devnull+xianwei.zhao.amlogic.com at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
>
> The power-controller module works well by adding its parent
> node secure-monitor.
>

Please add a Fixes tag here with the original commit where the
incorrectly placed node was added.
> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> index ce90b35686a2..24d00dce4969 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> @@ -65,10 +65,13 @@ xtal: xtal-clk {
>                 #clock-cells = <0>;
>         };
>
> -       pwrc: power-controller {
> -               compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwrc";
> -               #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> -               status = "okay";
> +       sm: secure-monitor {
> +               compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-sm";
> +
> +               pwrc: power-controller {
> +                       compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwrc";
> +                       #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +               };
In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/amlogic,meson-gxbb-sm.yaml
the hierarchy is:
firmware {
  secure-monitor {
     power-controller {
       ...
     }
  }
}

Is this patch correct (and the documentation needs to be adapted) or
is the documentation correct (and this patch has to be adapted)?