[PATCH 08/23] media: i2c: imx258: Add support for 24MHz clock

Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 4 01:03:58 PDT 2024


Hi Luigi311,

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:55:24AM -0600, Luigi311 wrote:
> On 3/28/24 02:09, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Luigi311,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patchset.
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 05:16:54PM -0600, git at luigi311.com wrote:
> >> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.com>
> >>
> >> There's no reason why only a clock of 19.2MHz is supported.
> >> Indeed this isn't even a frequency listed in the datasheet.
> >>
> >> Add support for 24MHz as well.
> >> The PLL settings result in slightly different link frequencies,
> >> so parameterise those.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luigi311 <git at luigi311.com>
> > 
> > Is Luigi311 your real name? As per
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, anonymous (or pseudonym I'd
> > say as well) contributions are not an option.
> 
> Luigi311 is not my real name but it would be a lot easier to find me if
> it was. My real name is Luis Garcia which is a super common name so its
> actually way easier to find me and all my work using my online name of
> Luigi311. I can go ahead and swap over to Luis Garcia if required but a
> name like that would provide no value in contacting/finding me since I'm
> not famous like all the other Luis Garcia's that appear on google.

Thanks. E-mail addresses are still unique, presumably, so that helps.

> 
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> index 351add1bc5d5..6ee7de079454 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> @@ -76,9 +76,6 @@
> >>  #define REG_CONFIG_MIRROR_FLIP		0x03
> >>  #define REG_CONFIG_FLIP_TEST_PATTERN	0x02
> >>  
> >> -/* Input clock frequency in Hz */
> >> -#define IMX258_INPUT_CLOCK_FREQ		19200000
> >> -
> >>  struct imx258_reg {
> >>  	u16 address;
> >>  	u8 val;
> >> @@ -115,7 +112,9 @@ struct imx258_mode {
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  /* 4208x3120 needs 1267Mbps/lane, 4 lanes */
> >> -static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_1267mbps[] = {
> >> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz[] = {
> >> +	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
> >> +	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
> >>  	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
> >>  	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
> >>  	{ 0x0305, 0x03 },
> >> @@ -133,7 +132,29 @@ static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_1267mbps[] = {
> >>  	{ 0x0823, 0xCC },
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> -static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_640mbps[] = {
> >> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_1272mbps_24mhz[] = {
> >> +	{ 0x0136, 0x18 },
> >> +	{ 0x0137, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
> >> +	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
> >> +	{ 0x0305, 0x04 },
> >> +	{ 0x0306, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0307, 0xD4 },
> >> +	{ 0x0309, 0x0A },
> >> +	{ 0x030B, 0x01 },
> >> +	{ 0x030D, 0x02 },
> >> +	{ 0x030E, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x030F, 0xD8 },
> >> +	{ 0x0310, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0820, 0x13 },
> >> +	{ 0x0821, 0x4C },
> >> +	{ 0x0822, 0xCC },
> >> +	{ 0x0823, 0xCC },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz[] = {
> >> +	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
> >> +	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
> >>  	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
> >>  	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
> >>  	{ 0x0305, 0x03 },
> >> @@ -151,9 +172,27 @@ static const struct imx258_reg mipi_data_rate_640mbps[] = {
> >>  	{ 0x0823, 0x00 },
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +static const struct imx258_reg mipi_642mbps_24mhz[] = {
> >> +	{ 0x0136, 0x18 },
> >> +	{ 0x0137, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0301, 0x05 },
> >> +	{ 0x0303, 0x02 },
> >> +	{ 0x0305, 0x04 },
> >> +	{ 0x0306, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0307, 0x6B },
> >> +	{ 0x0309, 0x0A },
> >> +	{ 0x030B, 0x01 },
> >> +	{ 0x030D, 0x02 },
> >> +	{ 0x030E, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x030F, 0xD8 },
> >> +	{ 0x0310, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0820, 0x0A },
> >> +	{ 0x0821, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0822, 0x00 },
> >> +	{ 0x0823, 0x00 },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  static const struct imx258_reg mode_common_regs[] = {
> >> -	{ 0x0136, 0x13 },
> >> -	{ 0x0137, 0x33 },
> >>  	{ 0x3051, 0x00 },
> >>  	{ 0x3052, 0x00 },
> >>  	{ 0x4E21, 0x14 },
> >> @@ -313,10 +352,6 @@ static const char * const imx258_supply_name[] = {
> >>  
> >>  #define IMX258_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(imx258_supply_name)
> >>  
> >> -/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
> >> -#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ	633600000ULL
> >> -#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ	320000000ULL
> >> -
> >>  enum {
> >>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS,
> >>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS,
> >> @@ -335,25 +370,55 @@ static u64 link_freq_to_pixel_rate(u64 f)
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  /* Menu items for LINK_FREQ V4L2 control */
> >> -static const s64 link_freq_menu_items[] = {
> >> +/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
> >> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ	633600000ULL
> >> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ	320000000ULL
> >> +
> >> +static const s64 link_freq_menu_items_19_2[] = {
> >>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_634MHZ,
> >>  	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_320MHZ,
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +/* Configurations for supported link frequencies */
> >> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_636MHZ	636000000ULL
> >> +#define IMX258_LINK_FREQ_321MHZ	321000000ULL
> > 
> > These values aren't used outside the array below and the macro names are
> > imprecise anyway. Could you put the numerical values to the array instead?
> 
> Ok I've removed the defines and just threw the values into the array instead.
> 
> > 
> >> +
> >> +static const s64 link_freq_menu_items_24[] = {
> >> +	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_636MHZ,
> >> +	IMX258_LINK_FREQ_321MHZ,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  /* Link frequency configs */
> >> -static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs[] = {
> >> +static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs_19_2[] = {
> >>  	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS] = {
> >>  		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
> >>  		.reg_list = {
> >> -			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_data_rate_1267mbps),
> >> -			.regs = mipi_data_rate_1267mbps,
> >> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz),
> >> +			.regs = mipi_1267mbps_19_2mhz,
> >>  		}
> >>  	},
> >>  	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS] = {
> >>  		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
> >>  		.reg_list = {
> >> -			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_data_rate_640mbps),
> >> -			.regs = mipi_data_rate_640mbps,
> >> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz),
> >> +			.regs = mipi_640mbps_19_2mhz,
> >> +		}
> >> +	},
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct imx258_link_freq_config link_freq_configs_24[] = {
> >> +	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_1267MBPS] = {
> >> +		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
> >> +		.reg_list = {
> >> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_1272mbps_24mhz),
> >> +			.regs = mipi_1272mbps_24mhz,
> >> +		}
> >> +	},
> >> +	[IMX258_LINK_FREQ_640MBPS] = {
> >> +		.pixels_per_line = IMX258_PPL_DEFAULT,
> >> +		.reg_list = {
> >> +			.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_642mbps_24mhz),
> >> +			.regs = mipi_642mbps_24mhz,
> >>  		}
> >>  	},
> >>  };
> >> @@ -410,6 +475,9 @@ struct imx258 {
> >>  	/* Current mode */
> >>  	const struct imx258_mode *cur_mode;
> >>  
> >> +	const struct imx258_link_freq_config *link_freq_configs;
> >> +	const s64 *link_freq_menu_items;
> >> +
> >>  	/*
> >>  	 * Mutex for serialized access:
> >>  	 * Protect sensor module set pad format and start/stop streaming safely.
> >> @@ -713,7 +781,7 @@ static int imx258_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>  		imx258->cur_mode = mode;
> >>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx258->link_freq, mode->link_freq_index);
> >>  
> >> -		link_freq = link_freq_menu_items[mode->link_freq_index];
> >> +		link_freq = imx258->link_freq_menu_items[mode->link_freq_index];
> >>  		pixel_rate = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq);
> >>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl_int64(imx258->pixel_rate, pixel_rate);
> >>  		/* Update limits and set FPS to default */
> >> @@ -727,7 +795,7 @@ static int imx258_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>  			vblank_def);
> >>  		__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx258->vblank, vblank_def);
> >>  		h_blank =
> >> -			link_freq_configs[mode->link_freq_index].pixels_per_line
> >> +			imx258->link_freq_configs[mode->link_freq_index].pixels_per_line
> >>  			 - imx258->cur_mode->width;
> >>  		__v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx258->hblank, h_blank,
> >>  					 h_blank, 1, h_blank);
> >> @@ -747,7 +815,7 @@ static int imx258_start_streaming(struct imx258 *imx258)
> >>  
> >>  	/* Setup PLL */
> >>  	link_freq_index = imx258->cur_mode->link_freq_index;
> >> -	reg_list = &link_freq_configs[link_freq_index].reg_list;
> >> +	reg_list = &imx258->link_freq_configs[link_freq_index].reg_list;
> >>  	ret = imx258_write_regs(imx258, reg_list->regs, reg_list->num_of_regs);
> >>  	if (ret) {
> >>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "%s failed to set plls\n", __func__);
> >> @@ -946,9 +1014,9 @@ static int imx258_init_controls(struct imx258 *imx258)
> >>  	imx258->link_freq = v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(ctrl_hdlr,
> >>  				&imx258_ctrl_ops,
> >>  				V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ,
> >> -				ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq_menu_items) - 1,
> >> +				ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq_menu_items_19_2) - 1,
> >>  				0,
> >> -				link_freq_menu_items);
> >> +				imx258->link_freq_menu_items);
> >>  
> >>  	if (imx258->link_freq)
> >>  		imx258->link_freq->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> >> @@ -964,8 +1032,10 @@ static int imx258_init_controls(struct imx258 *imx258)
> >>  	if (vflip)
> >>  		vflip->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> >>  
> >> -	pixel_rate_max = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq_menu_items[0]);
> >> -	pixel_rate_min = link_freq_to_pixel_rate(link_freq_menu_items[1]);
> >> +	pixel_rate_max =
> >> +		link_freq_to_pixel_rate(imx258->link_freq_menu_items[0]);
> >> +	pixel_rate_min =
> >> +		link_freq_to_pixel_rate(imx258->link_freq_menu_items[1]);
> > 
> > The arrays currently have two entries so this works but it'd nice to have a
> > bit more robust way to handle differences between the two arrays. Could you
> > maintain e.g. the number of entries in the array in a struct field perhaps?
> 
> Would it make more sense to do something like default to index 0 and then use 
> ARRAY_SIZE to iterate through the array and do a comparison to get the min and
> max size so it would always choose the correct value no matter how many entries
> there are?

I'll check that later patch you mentioned in the follow-up separately.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list