[PATCH v3 08/13] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name for a performance-domain

Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla at arm.com
Thu Sep 21 06:35:44 PDT 2023


On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:11, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > When an CPU's performance domain is managed through the SCMI firmware,
> > > let's enable us describe this as a consumer of a power-domain provider,
> > > which is the de-facto standard to use for performance domains. In this
> > > case, let's specify a corresponding power-domain-name, to point out the
> > > corresponding index for it.
> > >
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>
> > > Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >       - New patch.
> >
> > This patch and 10/13 are quite generic. I am happy to take it as part of
> > this series but just thought of checking again if that is what you prefer ?
> 
> Yes please, go ahead and pick this up through your scmi tree.
> 

Thanks, I just need Viresh's ack for cpufreq changes, we are otherwise all
set with the series. I will pull once I have his ack.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list