[PATCH] pwm: samsung: Document new member .channel in struct samsung_pwm_chip

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:58:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/10/2023 16:55, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 07:27:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:02:29 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>>> Fixes: 4c9548d24c0d ("pwm: samsung: Put per-channel data into driver data")
> >>>
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [1/1] pwm: samsung: Document new member .channel in struct samsung_pwm_chip
> >>>       commit: 4bb36d126cb3147d6bbfd00242a5b846dacad595
> >>
> >> You might want to change 4c9548d24c0d to e3fe982b2e4e now that you
> >> rewrote your for-next branch.
> > 
> > This is still open. I wonder there is no automated check that warns if
> > there is a Fixes: line in next that doesn't refer to an ancestor.
> 
> I am using Greg's/Stephen's scripts in commit hooks:
> https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/git-hooks-post-commit
> https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/verify_fixes.sh

Skimming throud the verify_fixes script I'd say the following addition
to verify_fixes should do:

diff --git a/linux/verify_fixes.sh b/linux/verify_fixes.sh
index f22384bb6bb8..12e73da82dd4 100755
--- a/linux/verify_fixes.sh
+++ b/linux/verify_fixes.sh
@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ verify_fixes()
 				continue
 			fi
 
+			if ! git merge-base --is-ancestor "$sha" "$c"; then
+				printf '%s%s\t\t- %s\n' "$commit_msg" "$fixes_msg" 'Target SHA should be an ancestor of your tree'
+				commit_msg=''
+				error=1
+				continue
+			fi
+
 			if [ "${#sha}" -lt 12 ]; then
 				msg="${msg:+${msg}${nl}}${tab}${tab}- SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long${nl}${tab}${tab}  Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11${nl}${tab}${tab}  or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to \"auto\")."
 			fi

It has quite a few hits in next ...

> Happy to receive more ideas during:
> https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1498/

I hope you pick up this idea even without me repeating this suggestion
there :-)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20231024/4ff74e49/attachment.sig>