[PATCH v10 3/5] KVM: arm64: Use per guest ID register for ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Sun May 28 03:52:59 PDT 2023


On Mon, 22 May 2023 23:18:33 +0100,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com> wrote:
> 
> With per guest ID registers, PMUver settings from userspace
> can be stored in its corresponding ID register.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  12 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |   6 --
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h             |   5 +-
>  4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 8a2fde6c04c4..7b0f43373dbe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -246,6 +246,13 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_TIMER_PPIS_IMMUTABLE		7
>  	/* SMCCC filter initialized for the VM */
>  #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SMCCC_FILTER_CONFIGURED		8
> +	/*
> +	 * AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver was set as ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF
> +	 * or DFR0_EL1.PerfMon was set as ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_IMPDEF from
> +	 * userspace for VCPUs without PMU.
> +	 */
> +#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU		9
> +
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -257,11 +264,6 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  
>  	cpumask_var_t supported_cpus;
>  
> -	struct {
> -		u8 imp:4;
> -		u8 unimp:4;
> -	} dfr0_pmuver;
> -
>  	/* Hypercall features firmware registers' descriptor */
>  	struct kvm_smccc_features smccc_feat;
>  	struct maple_tree smccc_filter;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 5114521ace60..ca18c09ccf82 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -148,12 +148,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	kvm_arm_init_hypercalls(kvm);
>  	kvm_arm_init_id_regs(kvm);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to
> -	 * create an actual PMU.
> -	 */
> -	kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_free_cpumask:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 9fb1c2f8f5a5..84d9e4baa4f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1178,9 +1178,12 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
> -		return vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp;
> +		return FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),
> +				 IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1));
> +	else if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags))
> +		return ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF;
>  
> -	return vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static u8 perfmon_to_pmuver(u8 perfmon)
> @@ -1403,8 +1406,12 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
>  			       u64 val)
>  {
> +	struct kvm_arch *arch = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
> +	u64 old_val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
>  	u8 pmuver, host_pmuver;
> +	u64 new_val = val;
>  	bool valid_pmu;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	host_pmuver = kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit();
>  
> @@ -1424,26 +1431,51 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) != valid_pmu)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&arch->config_lock);
>  	/* We can only differ with PMUver, and anything else is an error */
> -	val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> +	val ^= old_val;
>  	val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> -	if (val)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (val) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
> -	if (valid_pmu)
> -		vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = pmuver;
> -	else
> -		vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp = pmuver;
> +	/* Only allow userspace to change the idregs before VM running */
> +	if (kvm_vm_has_ran_once(vcpu->kvm)) {
> +		if (new_val != old_val)
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +	} else {
> +		if (valid_pmu) {
> +			val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> +			val &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> +			val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK, pmuver);
> +			IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) = val;
> +
> +			val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1);
> +			val &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> +			val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, pmuver_to_perfmon(pmuver));
> +			IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) = val;
> +		} else {
> +			assign_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags,
> +				   pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF);
> +		}
> +	}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&arch->config_lock);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			   const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
>  			   u64 val)
>  {
> +	struct kvm_arch *arch = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
> +	u64 old_val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
>  	u8 perfmon, host_perfmon;
> +	u64 new_val = val;
>  	bool valid_pmu;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	host_perfmon = pmuver_to_perfmon(kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
>  
> @@ -1464,18 +1496,39 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) != valid_pmu)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&arch->config_lock);
>  	/* We can only differ with PerfMon, and anything else is an error */
> -	val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> +	val ^= old_val;
>  	val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon);
> -	if (val)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (val) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
> -	if (valid_pmu)
> -		vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon);
> -	else
> -		vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp = perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon);
> +	/* Only allow userspace to change the idregs before VM running */
> +	if (kvm_vm_has_ran_once(vcpu->kvm)) {
> +		if (new_val != old_val)
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +	} else {
> +		if (valid_pmu) {
> +			val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1);
> +			val &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> +			val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, perfmon);
> +			IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) = val;
> +
> +			val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> +			val &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> +			val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK, perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon));
> +			IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) = val;
> +		} else {
> +			assign_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags,
> +				   perfmon == ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_IMPDEF);
> +		}
> +	}

This is the exact same code as for aa64fdr0. Make it a helper, please.

>  
> -	return 0;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&arch->config_lock);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -3422,6 +3475,17 @@ void kvm_arm_init_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	}
>  
>  	IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) = val;
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to
> +	 * create an actual PMU.
> +	 */
> +	val = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
> +
> +	val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> +	val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),
> +			  kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
> +
> +	IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) = val;
>  }
>  
>  int __init kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 1a6a695ca67a..8d70dbdc1e0a 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  /*
>   * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
>   */
> -#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)						\
> -	(vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5)
> +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)									\
> +	 (FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),					\
> +		    IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)) >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5)

This is getting unreadable. How about something like:

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 8d70dbdc1e0a..ecb55d87fa36 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -92,9 +92,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 /*
  * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
  */
-#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)									\
-	 (FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),					\
-		    IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)) >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5)
+#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)	({					\
+	u64 val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1); 		\
+	u8 v;								\
+									\
+	v = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), val);	\
+	v >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5;				\
+})
 
 u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
 
Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list