[PATCH] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Fix some error handling paths in sun8i_ths_probe()

[Ondřej Jirman]

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 07:32:54PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 
> Le 14/05/2023 à 19:10, Ondřej Jirman a écrit :
> > On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 07:00:34PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > 
> > > Le 14/05/2023 à 17:35, Ondřej Jirman a écrit :
> > > > Hello Christophe,
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > This changes the recommeded order of reset release/clock enable steps, eg. A64
> > > > manual says:
> > > > 
> > > > 	3.3.6.4. Gating and reset
> > > > 
> > > > 	Make sure that the reset signal has been released before the release of
> > > > 	module clock gating;
> > > 
> > > Ok, so moving reset_control_deassert() (and my proposed
> 
>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> > > devm_add_action_or_reset()) just after devm_reset_control_get() should keep
> > > the expected order, right?
> > 
> > That would be after reset_control_deassert(). devm_reset_control_get() is just
> > resource management, like devm_clk_get().
> 
> Not sure to get your point. I think you misunderstood what I tried to say.

Yes, I just misread what you wrote. What you suggested is fine.

kind regards,
	o.

> 
> I propose to move reset_control_deassert() in a v2. And have
> devm_add_action_or_reset() just after it.
> 
> Something like:
> 
> 	if (tmdev->chip->has_bus_clk_reset) {
> 		tmdev->reset = devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
> 		if (IS_ERR(tmdev->reset))
> 			return PTR_ERR(tmdev->reset);
> 
> 		ret = reset_control_deassert(tmdev->reset);
> 		if (ret)
> 			return ret;
> 
> 		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sun8i_ths_reset_control_assert,
> 					       tmdev->reset);
> 		if (ret)
> 			return ret;
> 
> 		tmdev->bus_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> 		if (IS_ERR(tmdev->bus_clk))
> 			return PTR_ERR(tmdev->bus_clk);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (tmdev->chip->has_mod_clk) {
> 		tmdev->mod_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "mod");
> 		if (IS_ERR(tmdev->mod_clk))
> 			return PTR_ERR(tmdev->mod_clk);
> 	}
> 
> 	ret = clk_set_rate(tmdev->mod_clk, 24000000);
> 	if (ret)
> 		return ret;
> 
> 
> This would keep the order of operation, still fix the leak in the probe and
> still save some LoC.
> 
> Would it make it?
> 
> CJ
> 
> > 
> > regards,
> > 	o.
> > 
>