[PATCH v5 5/8] mtd: spi-nor: Prepare the introduction of a new locking mechanism
Miquel Raynal
miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Tue Mar 28 08:41:02 PDT 2023
This commit alone just introduces two new "prepare and lock" pairs of
helpers which do the exact same thing as before. They will soon be
improved in a followup commit which actually brings the logic, but I
figured out it was more readable to do it this way.
One new pair is suffixed _pe which stands for "program and erase" and
hence is being called by spi_nor_write() and spi_nor_erase().
The other pair is suffixed _rd which stands for "read" and hence is
being called by spi_nor_read().
One note however, these extra helpers will need to know the operation
range, so they come with two new parameters to define it. Otherwise
there is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index e80677d36a8c..daed09950ee1 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -1086,6 +1086,7 @@ static void spi_nor_unprep(struct spi_nor *nor)
nor->controller_ops->unprepare(nor);
}
+/* Generic helpers for internal locking and serialization */
int spi_nor_prep_and_lock(struct spi_nor *nor)
{
int ret;
@@ -1106,6 +1107,48 @@ void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(struct spi_nor *nor)
spi_nor_unprep(nor);
}
+/* Internal locking helpers for program and erase operations */
+static int spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t start, size_t len)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = spi_nor_prep(nor);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&nor->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep_pe(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t start, size_t len)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&nor->lock);
+
+ spi_nor_unprep(nor);
+}
+
+/* Internal locking helpers for read operations */
+static int spi_nor_prep_and_lock_rd(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t start, size_t len)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = spi_nor_prep(nor);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&nor->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep_rd(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t start, size_t len)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&nor->lock);
+
+ spi_nor_unprep(nor);
+}
+
static u32 spi_nor_convert_addr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t addr)
{
if (!nor->params->convert_addr)
@@ -1459,7 +1502,7 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
addr = instr->addr;
len = instr->len;
- ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock(nor);
+ ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(nor, instr->addr, instr->len);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1522,7 +1565,7 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
ret = spi_nor_write_disable(nor);
erase_err:
- spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor);
+ spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep_pe(nor, instr->addr, instr->len);
return ret;
}
@@ -1715,11 +1758,13 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
{
struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
+ loff_t from_lock = from;
+ size_t len_lock = len;
ssize_t ret;
dev_dbg(nor->dev, "from 0x%08x, len %zd\n", (u32)from, len);
- ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock(nor);
+ ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_rd(nor, from_lock, len_lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1746,7 +1791,8 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
ret = 0;
read_err:
- spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor);
+ spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep_rd(nor, from_lock, len_lock);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -1765,7 +1811,7 @@ static int spi_nor_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
dev_dbg(nor->dev, "to 0x%08x, len %zd\n", (u32)to, len);
- ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock(nor);
+ ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(nor, to, len);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1807,7 +1853,8 @@ static int spi_nor_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
}
write_err:
- spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor);
+ spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep_pe(nor, to, len);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.34.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list