[PATCH v2 06/26] arm64: Add debug registers affected by HDFGxTR_EL2

[Miguel Luis]

Hi Marc,

A few comments on this one, please see below.

> On 28 Jul 2023, at 08:29, Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> The HDFGxTR_EL2 registers trap a (huge) set of debug and trace
> related registers. Add their encodings (and only that, because
> we really don't care about what these registers actually do at
> this stage).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 76289339b43b..9dfd127be55a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -194,6 +194,84 @@
> #define SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0 sys_reg(2, 3, 0, 5, 0)
> #define SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2 sys_reg(2, 4, 0, 7, 0)
> 
> +#define SYS_BRBINF_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, (n & 15), (((n & 16) >> 2) | 0))
> +#define SYS_BRBINFINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_BRBSRC_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, (n & 15), (((n & 16) >> 2) | 1))
> +#define SYS_BRBSRCINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_BRBTGT_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, (n & 15), (((n & 16) >> 2) | 2))
> +#define SYS_BRBTGTINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_BRBTS_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 2)
> +
> +#define SYS_BRBCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_BRBFCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 2, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_TRCITECR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 1, 2, 3)
> +#define SYS_TRCITECR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 1, 2, 3)

SYS_TRCITECR_EL1 shows up twice.

> +#define SYS_TRCACATR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 2, ((m & 7) << 1), (2 | (m >> 3)))

Besides m’s restrictions it could be sanitised in op2 to consider only bit m[3].
Suggestion for op2: (2 | ((m & 8) >> 3)))

> +#define SYS_TRCACVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 2, ((m & 7) << 1), (0 | (m >> 3)))

Same for SYS_TRCACVR(m) op2: (0 | ((m & 8) >> 3) )

> +#define SYS_TRCAUTHSTATUS sys_reg(2, 1, 7, 14, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCAUXCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 6, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCBBCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 15, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCCCCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 14, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCCIDCCTLR0 sys_reg(2, 1, 3, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCCIDCCTLR1 sys_reg(2, 1, 3, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCCIDCVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 3, ((m & 7) << 1), 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCCLAIMCLR sys_reg(2, 1, 7, 9, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCCLAIMSET sys_reg(2, 1, 7, 8, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCCNTCTLR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (4 | (m & 3)), 5)
> +#define SYS_TRCCNTRLDVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (0 | (m & 3)), 5)
> +#define SYS_TRCCNTVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (8 | (m & 3)), 5)
> +#define SYS_TRCCONFIGR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 4, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCDEVARCH sys_reg(2, 1, 7, 15, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCDEVID sys_reg(2, 1, 7, 2, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCEVENTCTL0R sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 8, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCEVENTCTL1R sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 9, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCEXTINSELR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (8 | (m & 3)), 4)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR0 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 8, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR10 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 2, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR11 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 3, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR12 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 4, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR13 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 5, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR1 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 9, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR2 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 10, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR3 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 11, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR4 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 12, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR5 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 13, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR6 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 14, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR7 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 15, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR8 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 0, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIDR9 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 1, 6)
> +#define SYS_TRCIMSPEC0 sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 0, 7)
> +#define SYS_TRCIMSPEC(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (m & 7), 7)

Since ‘m' restrictions are not being considered, when m = 0 it clashes with
SYS_TRCIMSPEC0 so overall SYS_TRCIMSPEC(m) already covers
SYS_TRCIMSPEC0. Is this redundancy needed?

> +#define SYS_TRCITEEDCR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 2, 1)
> +#define SYS_TRCOSLSR sys_reg(2, 1, 1, 1, 4)
> +#define SYS_TRCPRGCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCQCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_TRCRSCTLR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 1, (m & 15), (0 | (m >> 4)))

Suggestion for SYS_TRCRSCTLR(m) op2: (0 | ((m & 16) >> 4))

> +#define SYS_TRCRSR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 10, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCSEQEVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 0, (m & 3), 4)

Without considering ‘m' restrictions CRm can clash with 3.

Please let me know if I missed something.

Thanks
Miguel

> +#define SYS_TRCSEQRSTEVR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 6, 4)
> +#define SYS_TRCSEQSTR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 7, 4)
> +#define SYS_TRCSSCCR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 1, (m & 7), 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCSSCSR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 1, (8 | (m & 7)), 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCSSPCICR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 1, (m & 7), 3)
> +#define SYS_TRCSTALLCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 11, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCSTATR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 3, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCSYNCPR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 13, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCTRACEIDR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TRCTSCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 12, 0)
> +#define SYS_TRCVICTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVIIECTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVIPCSSCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 3, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVISSCTLR sys_reg(2, 1, 0, 2, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVMIDCCTLR0 sys_reg(2, 1, 3, 2, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVMIDCCTLR1 sys_reg(2, 1, 3, 3, 2)
> +#define SYS_TRCVMIDCVR(m) sys_reg(2, 1, 3, ((m & 7) << 1), 1)
> +
> +/* ETM */
> +#define SYS_TRCOSLAR sys_reg(2, 1, 1, 0, 4)
> +
> #define SYS_MIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> #define SYS_MPIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 5)
> #define SYS_REVIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 6)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>