[PATCH v2 1/3] perf/imx_ddr: speed up overflow frequency of cycle counter
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Jul 28 06:33:34 PDT 2023
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 06:37:56PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> For i.MX8MP, we cannot ensure that cycle counter overflow occurs at least
> 4 times as often as other events. Due to byte counters will count for any
> event configured, it will overflow more often. And if byte counters
> overflow that related counters would stop since they share the COUNTER_CNTL
> We can speed up cycle counter overflow frequency by setting counter
> parameter (CP) field of cycle counter. In this way, we can avoid stop
> counting byte counters when interrupt didn't come and the byte counters
> can be fetched or updated from each cycle counter overflow interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2 at nxp.com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - improve if condition
> ---
> drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c
> index 5222ba1e79d0..039069756bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
> #define CNTL_CLEAR_MASK 0xFFFFFFFD
> #define CNTL_OVER_MASK 0xFFFFFFFE
>
> +#define CNTL_CP_SHIFT 16
> +#define CNTL_CP_MASK (0xFF << CNTL_CP_SHIFT)
> #define CNTL_CSV_SHIFT 24
> #define CNTL_CSV_MASK (0xFFU << CNTL_CSV_SHIFT)
>
> @@ -427,6 +429,19 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_enable(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
> writel(0, pmu->base + reg);
> val = CNTL_EN | CNTL_CLEAR;
> val |= FIELD_PREP(CNTL_CSV_MASK, config);
> +
> + /*
> + * Workaround for i.MX8MP:
> + * Common counters and byte counters share the same COUNTER_CNTL,
> + * and byte counters could overflow before cycle counter. Need set
> + * counter parameter(CP) of cycle counter to give it initial value
> + * which can speed up cycle counter overflow frequency.
> + */
>From the comments on path 2, it sounds like this "counter parameter" sets bits
[31..28] of the counter value, is that correct?
Assuming so, could we please update this comment to say:
/*
* On i.MX8MP we need to bias the cycle counter to overflow more often.
* We do this by initializing bits [31:28] of the counter value via the
* COUNTER_CTRL Counter Parameter (CP) field.
*
* See ddr_perf_counter_enable() for more details.
*/
Thanks,
Mark.
> + if (pmu->devtype_data->quirks & DDR_CAP_AXI_ID_FILTER_ENHANCED) {
> + if (counter == EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER)
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(CNTL_CP_MASK, 0xf0);
> + }
> +
> writel(val, pmu->base + reg);
> } else {
> /* Disable counter */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list