[PATCH] arm64: vdso: remove two .altinstructions related symbols

Joey Gouly joey.gouly at arm.com
Thu Jul 27 03:55:30 PDT 2023


Hi,

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:36:19AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > The two symbols __alt_instructions and __alt_instructions_end are not
> > used, remove them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > index 6028f1fe2d1c..45354f2ddf70 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > @@ -50,9 +50,7 @@ SECTIONS
> >  
> >  	. = ALIGN(4);
> >  	.altinstructions : {
> > -		__alt_instructions = .;
> >  		*(.altinstructions)
> > -		__alt_instructions_end = .;
> >  	}
> 
> If we don't need the symbols, then why do we need this section at all?

Looks like it was a copy/paste from my commit 4e3bca8f7cdd ("arm64: alternative: patch alternatives in the vDSO").
The VDSO patching code searches for a section named '.altinstructions' by
reading the VDSO as an ELF file, and doesn't use the __alt_instructions /
__alt_instructions_end symbols.  The kernel patching code uses the
__alt_instructions symbol (from the vmlinux.ld.S linker script).

So it's safe to remove these, but the section itself needs to stay.

Thanks,
Joey



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list