[PATCH V2 3/4] soc: c3: Add support for power domains controller
Xianwei Zhao
xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com
Wed Jul 26 19:24:03 PDT 2023
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your reply.
On 2023/7/27 06:40, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com> writes:
>
>> Add support for C3 Power controller. C3 power control
>> registers are in secure domain, and should be accessed by SMC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2: Fixed some formatting.
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> index c11d65a3e3d9..a1ffebf70de3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/amlogic,c3-pwrc.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-s4-power.h>
>> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>> #include <linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h>
>> @@ -120,6 +121,22 @@ static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc a1_pwrc_domains[] = {
>> SEC_PD(RSA, 0),
>> };
>>
>> +static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc c3_pwrc_domains[] = {
>> + SEC_PD(C3_NNA, 0),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_AUDIO, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_SDIOA, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_EMMC, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_USB_COMB, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_SDCARD, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_ETH, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_GE2D, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_CVE, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_GDC_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_ISP_TOP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_MIPI_ISP_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> + SEC_PD(C3_VCODEC, 0),
>> +};
>
> All of these domains being hard-coded to ALWAYS_ON looks suspicious, and
> can also be an indicator that the drivers for these domains are not
> (properly) using runtime PM, or not connected to the correct domains the DT.
>
> Similar to the tables for s4 and a1 in this same file, please describe
> the reason that each of these domains needs to be hard coded to be
> always on.
Will do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list