[PATCH] perf arm64: Fix read PMU cpu slots
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
acme at kernel.org
Mon Jul 24 09:41:41 PDT 2023
Em Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 03:40:12PM +0800, Jing Zhang escreveu:
>
>
> 在 2023/7/24 下午1:06, Haixin Yu 写道:
> > Commit f8ad6018ce3c ("perf pmu: Remove duplication around
> > EVENT_SOURCE_DEVICE_PATH") uses sysfs__read_ull to read a full
> > sysfs path, which will never success. Fix it by read file directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx at linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> > index 561de0cb6b95..512a8f13c4de 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> > @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
> > perf_pmu__pathname_scnprintf(path, sizeof(path),
> > pmu->name, "caps/slots");
> > /*
> > - * The value of slots is not greater than 32 bits, but sysfs__read_int
> > - * can't read value with 0x prefix, so use sysfs__read_ull instead.
> > + * The value of slots is not greater than 32 bits, but
> > + * filename__read_int can't read value with 0x prefix,
> > + * so use filename__read_ull instead.
> > */
> > - sysfs__read_ull(path, &slots);
> > + filename__read_ull(path, &slots);
> > }
> >
> > return slots ? (double)slots : NAN;
>
> Yes, the function perf_pmu__pathname_scnprintf returns the complete slots file path "/sys/bus/xxxxx/caps/slots",
> and sysfs__read_ull will add the prefix "/sys" to the path, so the final file path becomes "/sys/sys/bus/xxxx/caps/slots"
> which does not exist, and the slots file cannot be successfully read, so sysfs__read_ull needs to be changed to the
> filename__read_ull.
>
> I tested it and it works well.
>
> Tested-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj at linux.alibaba.com>
I've applied this to my local branch, thanks.
I also added the missing:
Fixes: f8ad6018ce3c065a ("perf pmu: Remove duplication around EVENT_SOURCE_DEVICE_PATH")
This is another case where a 'perf test' entry would come in handy.
James, please check and ack,
- Arnaldo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list