[EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add bus recovery example

[Carlos Song]

Hi, Andy

Thank you very much for your advice!
I have re-made my patches based on your suggestion.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 6:42 AM
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> Cc: Carlos Song <carlos.song at nxp.com>; Aisheng Dong
> <aisheng.dong at nxp.com>; shawnguo at kernel.org; s.hauer at pengutronix.de;
> kernel at pengutronix.de; festevam at gmail.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org; conor+dt at kernel.org;
> Anson.Huang at nxp.com; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang at nxp.com>; Bough Chen
> <haibo.chen at nxp.com>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>;
> linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add bus recovery
> example
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this
> email' button
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > We also find the sci-gpio and sda-gpio have been defined in the ref:
> /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml.
> > > So is this the root cause of no need to add these properties?
> >
> > Yes.
> 
> is some cleanup needed also in i2c-imx.yaml?
> 

Carlos: I will not upstream any patch for i2c-imx.yaml. I will drop it.

> Andi