[PATCH] firmware: Explicitly include correct DT includes

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, at 17:14, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:44:37AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
>> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
>> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
>> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
>> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
>> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
>> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
>> explicitly include the correct includes.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
>>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-dsp.c     | 1 -
>>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c | 1 +
>>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c     | 1 +
>>  drivers/firmware/mtk-adsp-ipc.c    | 1 -
>>  drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c     | 1 +
>>  drivers/firmware/scpi_pm_domain.c  | 3 ++-
>>  drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c   | 1 -
>>  drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c      | 3 +--
>>  drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c   | 1 +
>>  10 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Not sure about the other maintainers, but I usually pick up
> firmware/tegra patches up through the Tegra tree and then they
> ultimately go through ARM SoC.
>
> Arnd, Olof, does it make sense for you guys to pick this up directly?

Sure, I was going to suggest the same thing.

Rob, can you send the patch to soc at kernel.org assuming nobody
has objections? Feel free to send this together with the bits
for drivers/soc, drivers/bus, arch/arm/mach-*/ and anything else
that usually gets merged this way.

     Arnd