[PATCH v5 5/7] media: mediatek: vcodec: Read HW active status from syscon
Hans Verkuil
hverkuil-cisco at xs4all.nl
Fri Jul 21 04:44:10 PDT 2023
On 30/06/2023 17:14, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> Remove the requirement of a VDEC_SYS reg iospace for both MT8173 and
> MT8183. To achieve that, rely on a vdecsys syscon to be passed through
> the DT, and use it to directly read the VDEC_HW_ACTIVE bit during IRQ
> handling to check whether the HW is active. Also update the VP8 stateful
> decoder to use the syscon, if present, for writes to VDEC_SYS.
>
> The old behavior is still present when reg-names aren't supplied, as
> to keep backward compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado at collabora.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Added explicit linux/bitfield.h include for FIELD_GET(), following
> 0day report
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Added new helper and updated VP8 stateful decoder to use it, so the
> syscon can also be used by mt8173
> - Made handling cleaner
> - Reworded commit
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Switched handling of VDEC_HW_ACTIVE to use a syscon instead of the
> 'active' clock
> - Reworded commit
> - Removed changes to subdev part of driver, since they aren't used by
> MT8183
>
> .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++---
> .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 1 +
> .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.c | 15 ++++
> .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h | 2 +
> .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp8_if.c | 10 +--
> 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> index 83780d29a9cf..742b6903d030 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> @@ -5,13 +5,16 @@
> * Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin at mediatek.com>
> */
>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-mem2mem.h>
> #include <media/videobuf2-dma-contig.h>
> @@ -38,22 +41,30 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_get_hw_count(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
> +static bool mtk_vcodec_is_hw_active(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> +{
> + u32 cg_status;
> +
> + if (dev->vdecsys_regmap)
> + return !regmap_test_bits(dev->vdecsys_regmap, VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_ADDR,
> + VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_MASK);
> +
> + cg_status = readl(dev->reg_base[VDEC_SYS] + VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_ADDR);
> + return !FIELD_GET(VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_MASK, cg_status);
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t mtk_vcodec_dec_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
> {
> struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev = priv;
> struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx;
> - u32 cg_status = 0;
> unsigned int dec_done_status = 0;
> void __iomem *vdec_misc_addr = dev->reg_base[VDEC_MISC] +
> VDEC_IRQ_CFG_REG;
>
> ctx = mtk_vcodec_get_curr_ctx(dev, MTK_VDEC_CORE);
>
> - /* check if HW active or not */
> - cg_status = readl(dev->reg_base[0] + VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_ADDR);
> - if ((cg_status & VDEC_HW_ACTIVE_MASK) != 0) {
> - mtk_v4l2_err("DEC ISR, VDEC active is not 0x0 (0x%08x)",
> - cg_status);
> + if (!mtk_vcodec_is_hw_active(dev)) {
> + mtk_v4l2_err("DEC ISR, VDEC active is not 0x0");
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> @@ -82,6 +93,33 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_get_reg_bases(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = dev->plat_dev;
> int reg_num, i;
> + struct resource *res;
> + bool has_vdecsys_reg;
> + static const char * const mtk_dec_reg_names[] = {
> + "misc",
> + "ld",
> + "top",
> + "cm",
> + "ad",
> + "av",
> + "pp",
> + "hwd",
> + "hwq",
> + "hwb",
> + "hwg"
> + };
> +
> + /*
> + * If we have reg-names in devicetree, this means that we're on a new
> + * register organization, which implies that the VDEC_SYS iospace gets
> + * R/W through a syscon (regmap).
> + * Here we try to get the "misc" iostart only to check if we have reg-names
> + */
> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "misc");
> + if (res)
> + has_vdecsys_reg = false;
> + else
> + has_vdecsys_reg = true;
>
> /* Sizeof(u32) * 4 bytes for each register base. */
> reg_num = of_property_count_elems_of_size(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg",
> @@ -91,12 +129,29 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_get_reg_bases(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> - dev->reg_base[i] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, i);
> - if (IS_ERR(dev->reg_base[i]))
> - return PTR_ERR(dev->reg_base[i]);
> + if (has_vdecsys_reg) {
> + for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> + dev->reg_base[i] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, i);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->reg_base[i]))
> + return PTR_ERR(dev->reg_base[i]);
> +
> + mtk_v4l2_debug(2, "reg[%d] base=%p", i, dev->reg_base[i]);
> + }
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> + dev->reg_base[i+1] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, mtk_dec_reg_names[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->reg_base[i+1]))
> + return PTR_ERR(dev->reg_base[i+1]);
>
> - mtk_v4l2_debug(2, "reg[%d] base=%p", i, dev->reg_base[i]);
> + mtk_v4l2_debug(2, "reg[%d] base=%p", i+1, dev->reg_base[i+1]);
> + }
> +
> + dev->vdecsys_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "mediatek,vdecsys");
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->vdecsys_regmap)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing mediatek,vdecsys property");
> + return PTR_ERR(dev->vdecsys_regmap);
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> index f17d67e781c9..0b430936f67d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dev {
> void __iomem *reg_base[NUM_MAX_VCODEC_REG_BASE];
> const struct mtk_vcodec_dec_pdata *vdec_pdata;
> const struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata *venc_pdata;
> + struct regmap *vdecsys_regmap;
You forgot to add the kerneldoc documentation for this new field.
If you just give me the documentation of this field then I can modify the
patch. That's actually easier for me.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list