[PATCH] zsmalloc: Fix races between modifications of fullness and isolated

[Andrew Yang]

Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int,
modifications of them should be protected by the same lock.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang at mediatek.com>
Fixes: c4549b871102 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration")
---
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 32f5bc4074df..b96230402a8d 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
 
 static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
 {
+	struct zs_pool *pool;
 	struct zspage *zspage;
 
 	/*
@@ -1786,9 +1787,10 @@ static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page);
 
 	zspage = get_zspage(page);
-	migrate_write_lock(zspage);
+	pool = zspage->pool;
+	spin_lock(&pool->lock);
 	inc_zspage_isolation(zspage);
-	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1858,8 +1860,8 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 	 * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
 	 * it's okay to release the pool's lock.
 	 */
-	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 	dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
 
 	get_page(newpage);
@@ -1876,14 +1878,16 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 
 static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page)
 {
+	struct zs_pool *pool;
 	struct zspage *zspage;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page);
 
 	zspage = get_zspage(page);
-	migrate_write_lock(zspage);
+	pool = zspage->pool;
+	spin_lock(&pool->lock);
 	dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
-	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 }
 
 static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = {
-- 
2.18.0