[PATCH 03/10] iommu: Add generic_single_device_group()
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at nvidia.com
Thu Jul 20 05:04:11 PDT 2023
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:39:27PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2023/7/19 3:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This implements the common pattern seen in drivers of a single
> > iommu_group for the entire iommu driver. Implement this in core code
> > so the drivers that want this can select it from their ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/iommu.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index 9e41ad4e3219b6..1e0c5d9a0370fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -289,6 +289,9 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
> > spin_lock(&iommu_device_lock);
> > list_del(&iommu->list);
> > spin_unlock(&iommu_device_lock);
> > +
> > + /* Pairs with the alloc in generic_single_device_group() */
> > + iommu_group_put(iommu->singleton_group);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_unregister);
> > @@ -1595,6 +1598,28 @@ struct iommu_group *generic_device_group(struct device *dev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_device_group);
> > +/*
> > + * Generic device_group call-back function. It just allocates one
> > + * iommu-group per iommu driver.
> > + */
> > +struct iommu_group *generic_single_device_group(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct iommu_device *iommu = dev->iommu->iommu_dev;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!iommu->singleton_group) {
> > + struct iommu_group *group;
> > +
> > + group = iommu_group_alloc();
> > + if (IS_ERR(group))
> > + return group;
> > + iommu->singleton_group = group;
> > + }
> > + return iommu_group_ref_get(iommu->singleton_group);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_single_device_group);
>
> When allocating the singleton group for the first time, the group's
> refcount is taken twice.
Yes, that is correct.
The refcount from alloc belongs to iommu->singleton_group and the
pair'd put is here:
@@ -289,6 +289,9 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
spin_lock(&iommu_device_lock);
list_del(&iommu->list);
spin_unlock(&iommu_device_lock);
+
+ /* Pairs with the alloc in generic_single_device_group() */
+ iommu_group_put(iommu->singleton_group);
}
The refcount from iommu_group_ref_get() belongs to the caller and the
caller must have a paired put.
> struct iommu_group *generic_single_device_group(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iommu_device *iommu = dev->iommu->iommu_dev;
> struct iommu_group *group;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
>
> if (iommu->singleton_group)
> return iommu_group_ref_get(iommu->singleton_group);
>
> group = iommu_group_alloc();
> if (!IS_ERR(group))
> iommu->singleton_group = group;
>
> return group;
This will UAF the iommu->singleton_group, consider a caller that does:
iommu_group_put(generic_single_device_group(dev))
Jason
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list