[PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET on TI AM65x

[Li, Hua Qian]

On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:27 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 08:24, Li, Hua Qian wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 17/07/2023 06:07, huaqian.li at siemens.com wrote:
> > > > From: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li at siemens.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The watchdog hardware of TI AM65X platform does not support
> > > > WDIOF_CARDRESET feature, add a reserved memory to save the
> > > > watchdog
> > > > reset cause, to know if the board reboot is due to a watchdog
> > > > reset.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li at siemens.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - Fix the coding style.
> > > > - Add usage note for the reserved memory.
> > > > - Link to v3:
> > > >  
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230713095127.1230109-1-huaqian.li@siemens.com
> > > 
> > > Much more changed. You added example in the bindings which no one
> > > asked
> > > for. Then you added multiple fake review tags to all the patches.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> > > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Sorry for the wrong statement. I missed some key information and
> > missunderstood `Reviewed-by`, I treated `Reviewed-by` as `Who
> > has reviewed`.
> 
> But you don't have even that information who has reviewed! Where do
> you
> see any reviews coming from me for patch #2? Where do you see reviews
> from Rob for patch #3?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
I got these information from my email thread. Anyway I made a stupid
mistake, sorry for wasting your time.

By the way, when you wrote the following in '[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-
bindings: watchdog: ti,rti-wdt: Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET', you
were kind of saying that it looks good to you if I remove the extra
empty line, right?

In any case:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>

Best regards,
Li Hua Qian