[PATCH v14 01/25] docs: gunyah: Introduce Gunyah Hypervisor
Alex Elder
elder at linaro.org
Fri Jul 14 06:35:40 PDT 2023
On 7/3/23 5:41 PM, Elliot Berman wrote:
>> If it's signaled after every message is sent, does it
>> indicate that the message has been *received* by VM_B
>> (versus just received and copied by Gunyah)?
>>
>
> To connect some dots: the Tx vIRQ is fired when the reader reads a
> message and the number of messages still in the queue decrements to the
> "not full" threshold.
>
> https://github.com/quic/gunyah-hypervisor/blob/3d4014404993939f898018cfb1935c2d9bfc2830/hyp/ipc/msgqueue/src/msgqueue_common.c#L142-L148
So the Tx vIRQ on the sender is only fired when the state of the
receiver's Rx queue goes from "full" to "not full".
Normally there is no signal sent, and a sender sends messages
until it gets a "queue full" flag back from a gh_msgq_send()
call. At that point it should stop sending, until the Tx vIRQ
fires to indicate the receiver queue has "room" (fewer than
the "full threshold" messages are consumed).
There is no way (at this layer of the protocol) to tell whether
a given message has been *received*, only that it has been *sent*
(meaning the hypervisor has accepted it). And Gunyah provides
reliable delivery (each message received in send order, exactly
once).
Now that I re-read what you said it makes sense and I guess I
just misunderstood. There *might* be a way to reword slightly
to prevent any misinterpretation.
Thanks.
-Alex
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list