[EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add mu binding doc

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/07/2023 19:52, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 6:51 PM
>> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>; robh+dt at kernel.org;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org; conor+dt at kernel.org;
>> shawnguo at kernel.org; s.hauer at pengutronix.de; kernel at pengutronix.de;
>> festevam at gmail.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Gaurav
>> Jain <gaurav.jain at nxp.com>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Daniel Baluta
>> <daniel.baluta at nxp.com>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add mu binding doc
>>
>> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
>> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
>> this email' button
>>
>>
>> On 16/06/2023 20:11, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>> The NXP i.MX Message Unit enables two processing elements to
>>> communicate & co-ordinate with each other. This driver is used to
>>> communicate between Application Core and NXP HSM IPs like NXP
>> EdgeLock
>>> Enclave etc.
>>> It exists on some i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 etc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>
>>
>> I don't see reply to Daniel's concerns.
>>
>> I don't see improvements here based on the previous review you received.
>> It seems you just ignored everything, right?
> Replied to Daniel's concern.
> 
>>
>> Limited review follows up because binding is not in the shape for upstream.
>> Do some internal reviews prior sending it.
> Done the internal review.

I doubt. Your v4 bindings and DTS were not tested. v4 Driver has trivial
issues.

Best regards,
Krzysztof