[PATCH bpf-next v9 3/3] selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments
menglong8.dong at gmail.com
menglong8.dong at gmail.com
Wed Jul 12 01:47:46 PDT 2023
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong at tencent.com>
Add fentry_many_args.c and fexit_many_args.c to test the fentry/fexit
with 7/11 arguments. As this feature is not supported by arm64 yet, we
disable these testcases for arm64 in DENYLIST.aarch64. We can combine
them with fentry_test.c/fexit_test.c when arm64 is supported too.
Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
bpf_testmod_fentry_test11() to bpf_testmod.c
Meanwhile, add bpf_modify_return_test2() to test_run.c to test the
MODIFY_RETURN with 7 arguments.
Add bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7 in
bpf_testmod.c to test the struct in the arguments.
And the testcases passed on x86_64:
./test_progs -t fexit
Summary: 5/14 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t fentry
Summary: 3/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t modify_return
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t tracing_struct
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong at tencent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs at fb.com>
---
v9:
- change the way to test fmod_ret
v8:
- split the testcases, and add fentry_many_args/fexit_many_args to
DENYLIST.aarch64
v6:
- add testcases to tracing_struct.c instead of fentry_test.c and
fexit_test.c
v5:
- add testcases for MODIFY_RETURN
v4:
- use different type for args in bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12}
- add testcase for grabage values in ctx
v3:
- move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to
bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile
- get return value by bpf_get_func_ret() in
"fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12", as we don't change ___bpf_ctx_cast()
in this version
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 14 ++++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c | 43 +++++++++++++--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c | 43 +++++++++++++--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c | 10 ++--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 19 +++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c | 39 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c | 40 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c | 40 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
11 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 63b11f7a5392..7d47f53f20c1 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -565,6 +565,13 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test(int a, int *b)
return a + *b;
}
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test2(int a, int *b, short c, int d,
+ void *e, char f, int g)
+{
+ *b += 1;
+ return a + *b + c + d + (long)e + f + g;
+}
+
int noinline bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a)
{
return a + 1;
@@ -600,6 +607,7 @@ __diag_pop();
BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_fentry_test1, KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_test_modify_return_ids)
@@ -667,7 +675,11 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog,
case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN:
ret = bpf_modify_return_test(1, &b);
if (b != 2)
- side_effect = 1;
+ side_effect++;
+ b = 2;
+ ret += bpf_modify_return_test2(1, &b, 3, 4, (void *)5, 6, 7);
+ if (b != 2)
+ side_effect++;
break;
default:
goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
index 08adc805878b..3b61e8b35d62 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs # link_fd unexpected link_fd: a
kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms # link_fd unexpected link_fd: actual -95 < expected 0
kprobe_multi_test/skel_api # libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3
module_attach # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
+fentry_test/fentry_many_args # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
+fexit_test/fexit_many_args # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index aaf6ef1201c7..a6f991b56345 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
int b[];
};
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
+ u64 a;
+ int b;
+};
+
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
"Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF");
@@ -75,6 +80,24 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *a) {
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e,
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 f)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + (long)b + c + d +
+ (long)e + f.a + f.b;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e,
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 f, int g)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + (long)b + c + d +
+ (long)e + f.a + f.b + g;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc void
bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i)
{
@@ -191,6 +214,20 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
return a + b + c;
}
+noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
+ void *e, char f, int g)
+{
+ return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g;
+}
+
+noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test11(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d,
+ void *e, char f, int g,
+ unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j,
+ unsigned long k)
+{
+ return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g + h + i + j + k;
+}
+
int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
noinline ssize_t
@@ -206,6 +243,7 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 struct_arg1 = {10};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 struct_arg4 = {21, 22};
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -216,6 +254,11 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3(1, 4, struct_arg2);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct_arg1, 1, 2, 3, struct_arg2);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5();
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7(16, (void *)17, 18, 19,
+ (void *)20, struct_arg4);
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(16, (void *)17, 18, 19,
+ (void *)20, struct_arg4, 23);
+
struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) +
sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -243,7 +286,11 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
if (bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(1) != 2 ||
bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(2, 3) != 5 ||
- bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15)
+ bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15 ||
+ bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
+ 21, 22) != 133 ||
+ bpf_testmod_fentry_test11(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
+ 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) != 231)
goto out;
bpf_testmod_fentry_ok = 1;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
index c0d1d61d5f66..aee1bc77a17f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
@@ -2,8 +2,9 @@
/* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "fentry_test.lskel.h"
+#include "fentry_many_args.skel.h"
-static int fentry_test(struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel)
+static int fentry_test_common(struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel)
{
int err, prog_fd, i;
int link_fd;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ static int fentry_test(struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel)
return 0;
}
-void test_fentry_test(void)
+static void fentry_test(void)
{
struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel = NULL;
int err;
@@ -46,13 +47,47 @@ void test_fentry_test(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fentry_skel, "fentry_skel_load"))
goto cleanup;
- err = fentry_test(fentry_skel);
+ err = fentry_test_common(fentry_skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_first_attach"))
goto cleanup;
- err = fentry_test(fentry_skel);
+ err = fentry_test_common(fentry_skel);
ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_second_attach");
cleanup:
fentry_test_lskel__destroy(fentry_skel);
}
+
+static void fentry_many_args(void)
+{
+ struct fentry_many_args *fentry_skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ fentry_skel = fentry_many_args__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fentry_skel, "fentry_many_args_skel_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = fentry_many_args__attach(fentry_skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_many_args_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(fentry_skel->bss->test1_result, 1,
+ "fentry_many_args_result1");
+ ASSERT_EQ(fentry_skel->bss->test2_result, 1,
+ "fentry_many_args_result2");
+ ASSERT_EQ(fentry_skel->bss->test3_result, 1,
+ "fentry_many_args_result3");
+
+cleanup:
+ fentry_many_args__destroy(fentry_skel);
+}
+
+void test_fentry_test(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("fentry"))
+ fentry_test();
+ if (test__start_subtest("fentry_many_args"))
+ fentry_many_args();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
index 101b7343036b..1c13007e37dd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c
@@ -2,8 +2,9 @@
/* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "fexit_test.lskel.h"
+#include "fexit_many_args.skel.h"
-static int fexit_test(struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel)
+static int fexit_test_common(struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel)
{
int err, prog_fd, i;
int link_fd;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ static int fexit_test(struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel)
return 0;
}
-void test_fexit_test(void)
+static void fexit_test(void)
{
struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel = NULL;
int err;
@@ -46,13 +47,47 @@ void test_fexit_test(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fexit_skel, "fexit_skel_load"))
goto cleanup;
- err = fexit_test(fexit_skel);
+ err = fexit_test_common(fexit_skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fexit_first_attach"))
goto cleanup;
- err = fexit_test(fexit_skel);
+ err = fexit_test_common(fexit_skel);
ASSERT_OK(err, "fexit_second_attach");
cleanup:
fexit_test_lskel__destroy(fexit_skel);
}
+
+static void fexit_many_args(void)
+{
+ struct fexit_many_args *fexit_skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ fexit_skel = fexit_many_args__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fexit_skel, "fexit_many_args_skel_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = fexit_many_args__attach(fexit_skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fexit_many_args_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(fexit_skel->bss->test1_result, 1,
+ "fexit_many_args_result1");
+ ASSERT_EQ(fexit_skel->bss->test2_result, 1,
+ "fexit_many_args_result2");
+ ASSERT_EQ(fexit_skel->bss->test3_result, 1,
+ "fexit_many_args_result3");
+
+cleanup:
+ fexit_many_args__destroy(fexit_skel);
+}
+
+void test_fexit_test(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("fexit"))
+ fexit_test();
+ if (test__start_subtest("fexit_many_args"))
+ fexit_many_args();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c
index 5d9955af6247..a70c99c2f8c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ static void run_test(__u32 input_retval, __u16 want_side_effect, __s16 want_ret)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fexit_result, 1, "modify_return fexit_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fmod_ret_result, 1, "modify_return fmod_ret_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fentry_result2, 1, "modify_return fentry_result2");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fexit_result2, 1, "modify_return fexit_result2");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fmod_ret_result2, 1, "modify_return fmod_ret_result2");
+
cleanup:
modify_return__destroy(skel);
}
@@ -49,9 +53,9 @@ static void run_test(__u32 input_retval, __u16 want_side_effect, __s16 want_ret)
void serial_test_modify_return(void)
{
run_test(0 /* input_retval */,
- 1 /* want_side_effect */,
- 4 /* want_ret */);
+ 2 /* want_side_effect */,
+ 33 /* want_ret */);
run_test(-EINVAL /* input_retval */,
0 /* want_side_effect */,
- -EINVAL /* want_ret */);
+ -EINVAL * 2 /* want_ret */);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index 1c75a32186d6..fe0fb0c9849a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -55,6 +55,25 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_d, 19, "t7:d");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_e, 20, "t7:e");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_f_a, 21, "t7:f.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_f_b, 22, "t7:f.b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_ret, 133, "t7 ret");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_a, 16, "t8:a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_b, 17, "t8:b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_c, 18, "t8:c");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_d, 19, "t8:d");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_e, 20, "t8:e");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_f_a, 21, "t8:f.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_f_b, 22, "t8:f.b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
+
tracing_struct__detach(skel);
destroy_skel:
tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b61bb92fee2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Tencent */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 test1_result = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7")
+int BPF_PROG(test1, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g)
+{
+ test1_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test2_result = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11")
+int BPF_PROG(test2, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g, unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j, unsigned long k)
+{
+ test2_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+ i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test3_result = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11")
+int BPF_PROG(test3, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f,
+ __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k)
+{
+ test3_result = a == 16 && b == 17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == 20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+ i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26;
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..53b335c2dafb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Tencent */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 test1_result = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7")
+int BPF_PROG(test1, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g, int ret)
+{
+ test1_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && ret == 133;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test2_result = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11")
+int BPF_PROG(test2, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g, unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j, unsigned long k,
+ int ret)
+{
+ test2_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+ i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && ret == 231;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test3_result = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11")
+int BPF_PROG(test3, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f,
+ __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k, __u64 ret)
+{
+ test3_result = a == 16 && b == 17 && c == 18 && d == 19 &&
+ e == 20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 &&
+ i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && ret == 231;
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c
index 8b7466a15c6b..3376d4849f58 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c
@@ -47,3 +47,43 @@ int BPF_PROG(fexit_test, int a, __u64 b, int ret)
return 0;
}
+
+static int sequence2;
+
+__u64 fentry_result2 = 0;
+SEC("fentry/bpf_modify_return_test2")
+int BPF_PROG(fentry_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g)
+{
+ sequence2++;
+ fentry_result2 = (sequence2 == 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 fmod_ret_result2 = 0;
+SEC("fmod_ret/bpf_modify_return_test2")
+int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g, int ret)
+{
+ sequence2++;
+ /* This is the first fmod_ret program, the ret passed should be 0 */
+ fmod_ret_result2 = (sequence2 == 2 && ret == 0);
+ return input_retval;
+}
+
+__u64 fexit_result2 = 0;
+SEC("fexit/bpf_modify_return_test2")
+int BPF_PROG(fexit_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+ int g, int ret)
+{
+ sequence2++;
+ /* If the input_reval is non-zero a successful modification should have
+ * occurred.
+ */
+ if (input_retval)
+ fexit_result2 = (sequence2 == 3 && ret == input_retval);
+ else
+ fexit_result2 = (sequence2 == 3 && ret == 29);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index c435a3a8328a..515daef3c84b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
int b[];
};
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
+ u64 a;
+ int b;
+};
+
long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
__u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
@@ -25,6 +30,9 @@ long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret;
long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
long t5_ret;
int t6;
+long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
+long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
+
SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
@@ -130,4 +138,50 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_12, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+ void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f)
+{
+ t7_a = a;
+ t7_b = (long)b;
+ t7_c = c;
+ t7_d = d;
+ t7_e = (long)e;
+ t7_f_a = f.a;
+ t7_f_b = f.b;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_13, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+ void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret)
+{
+ t7_ret = ret;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_14, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+ void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g)
+{
+ t8_a = a;
+ t8_b = (long)b;
+ t8_c = c;
+ t8_d = d;
+ t8_e = (long)e;
+ t8_f_a = f.a;
+ t8_f_b = f.b;
+ t8_g = g;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_15, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+ void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g,
+ int, ret)
+{
+ t8_ret = ret;
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.40.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list