[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Document fsl,startup-delay-ms
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Mon Jul 10 02:18:56 PDT 2023
On 7/10/23 10:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 01:24, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Document fsl,startup-delay-ms property which indicates how long
>> the system software should wait until attempting to communicate
>> with the CM firmware. This gives the CM firmware a bit of time
>> to boot and get ready for communication.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>> ---
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
>> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx at nxp.com>
>> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel at pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
>> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-remoteproc at vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
>> index 0c3910f152d1d..c940199ce89df 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
>> @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ properties:
>> This property is to specify the resource id of the remote processor in SoC
>> which supports SCFW
>>
>> + fsl,startup-delay-ms:
>> + default: 0
>> + description:
>> + CM firmware start up delay.
>
> I don't see particular improvements from v2 and no responses addressing
> my comment:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221102112451.128110-2-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
I wasn't aware of this being submitted before, esp. since I wrote the
binding document from scratch. Which comment is not addressed, the type
ref is not present and the sentence starts with caps, so what is missing ?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list