[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: fix DEBIX binding
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Wed Jul 5 02:28:07 PDT 2023
On 05.07.23 08:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2023 20:41, Marco Felsch wrote:
>> The current imx8mp-debix-model-a.dts uses all three compatibles. Fix the
>> corresponding bindings by adding an own entry for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch at pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>> index 15d4110840654..d9e763ef932e5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>> @@ -1019,8 +1019,6 @@ properties:
>> - dmo,imx8mp-data-modul-edm-sbc # i.MX8MP eDM SBC
>> - fsl,imx8mp-evk # i.MX8MP EVK Board
>> - gateworks,imx8mp-gw74xx # i.MX8MP Gateworks Board
>> - - polyhex,imx8mp-debix # Polyhex Debix boards
>> - - polyhex,imx8mp-debix-model-a # Polyhex Debix Model A Board
>> - toradex,verdin-imx8mp # Verdin iMX8M Plus Modules
>> - toradex,verdin-imx8mp-nonwifi # Verdin iMX8M Plus Modules without Wi-Fi / BT
>> - toradex,verdin-imx8mp-wifi # Verdin iMX8M Plus Wi-Fi / BT Modules
>> @@ -1054,6 +1052,13 @@ properties:
>> - const: phytec,imx8mp-phycore-som # phyCORE-i.MX8MP SoM
>> - const: fsl,imx8mp
>>
>> + - description: Polyhex DEBIX i.MX8MP based SBCs
>> + items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - polyhex,imx8mp-debix-model-a # Polyhex Debix Model A Board
>> + - const: polyhex,imx8mp-debix # Polyhex Debix boards
>
> Same comments as for patch #2. I think this should be rather deprecated
> - not a good pattern.
The middle compatible was my suggestion, because there's also the Debix Model
B Standard and Model B SE, which is the same board, but different SoC variant:
Model A: Commercial Temperature Grade
Model B Standard: Industrial Temperature Grade
Model B SE: Industrial Temperature Grate, but i.MX8MP Lite
(No Neural/Video/Image accelerators).
As everything outside the SoC is the same, I wanted a generic board
compatible that bootloaders can match against. The SoMs should probably
not reuse it, but I think it should be kept (perhaps renamed?) for the
SBCs that don't utilize the Debix SoM.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list