[PATCH 2/3] soc: c3: Add support for power domains controller
Neil Armstrong
neil.armstrong at linaro.org
Mon Jul 3 06:29:31 PDT 2023
Hi,
On 03/07/2023 11:31, =Xianwei Zhao wrote:
> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
>
> Add support for C3 Power controller. C3 power control
> registers are in secure domain, and should be accessed by SMC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao at amlogic.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
> index 25b4b71df9b8..39ccc8f2e630 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-s4-power.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/amlogic-c3-power.h>
> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> #include <linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -132,6 +133,22 @@ static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc s4_pwrc_domains[] = {
> SEC_PD(S4_AUDIO, 0),
> };
>
> +static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc c3_pwrc_domains[] = {
> + SEC_PD(C3_NNA, 0),
> + SEC_PD(C3_AUDIO, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_SDIOA, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_EMMC, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_USB_COMB, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_SDCARD, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_ETH, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_GE2D, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_CVE, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_GDC_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_ISP_TOP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_MIPI_ISP_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
> + SEC_PD(C3_VCODEC, 0),
> +};
Please move this struct before _s4_
> +
> static int meson_secure_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -179,7 +196,7 @@ static int meson_secure_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i = 0 ; i < match->count ; ++i) {
> struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain *dom = &pwrc->domains[i];
>
> - if (!match->domains[i].index)
> + if (!match->domains[i].name)
Is this change necessary ? If yes please move it to another patch
and explain it's purpose. If it fixes something, add a Fixes tag so
it can be backported.
Thanks,
Neil
> continue;
>
> dom->pwrc = pwrc;
> @@ -207,6 +224,11 @@ static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_data meson_secure_s4_pwrc_data = {
> .count = ARRAY_SIZE(s4_pwrc_domains),
> };
>
> +static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_data amlogic_secure_c3_pwrc_data = {
> + .domains = c3_pwrc_domains,
> + .count = ARRAY_SIZE(c3_pwrc_domains),
> +};
Please move this struct before _s4_
> +
> static const struct of_device_id meson_secure_pwrc_match_table[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "amlogic,meson-a1-pwrc",
> @@ -216,6 +238,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id meson_secure_pwrc_match_table[] = {
> .compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwrc",
> .data = &meson_secure_s4_pwrc_data,
> },
> + {
> + .compatible = "amlogic,c3-pwrc",
> + .data = &amlogic_secure_c3_pwrc_data,
> + },
Please move this entry before _s4_
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_secure_pwrc_match_table);
Thanks,
Neil
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list