[PATCH v5 04/11] media: bcm2835-unicam: Add support for CCP2/CSI2 camera interface

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:20:29PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 01:01:38AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > > > > > If the hardware doesn't support lane remapping for CCP2, then that should
> > > > > > > > be reflected in DT bindings, i.e. data-lanes isn't relevant. There's no
> > > > > > > > need to check that here.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Should the above check for CSI-2 be dropped as well then ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Same for CSI-2, too: if there's nothing to configure there (lane remapping)
> > > > > > there's no need to validate that part of the DT either.
> > > > > 
> > > > > OK, I'll drop that.
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, I'm wondering if it would make sense to tell the parsing
> > > > functions whether lane reordering is supported or not. The checks could
> > > > then be moved to the framework. What do you think ?
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how useful this check would be in the first place: if you have
> > > hardware that can reorder the lanes, the framework doesn't know what to
> > > check there (if anything) and otherwise there's little point in the
> > > entire check.
> > 
> > Isn't it good to tell users that something is wrong instead of accepting
> > the invalid configuration and let them wonder why the device isn't
> > working ? Users in this case would be system integrators, not end
> > users, but we have lots of debugging information in the kernel aimed for
> > them already.
> 
> In which of the two cases above the framework could do something useful
> there? For devices where you can reorder the lanes or for those where you
> can't?

For devices where you can't, to detect DT that reorders lanes.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart