[PATCH v7 1/2] clk: stm32: introduce clocks for STM32MP257 platform

[Gabriel FERNANDEZ]

On 12/20/23 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com (2023-12-19 05:09:08)
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..313e022c6142
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1826 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2023 - All Rights Reserved
>> + * Author: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com> for STMicroelectronics.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +
>> +#include "clk-stm32-core.h"
>> +#include "reset-stm32.h"
>> +#include "stm32mp25_rcc.h"
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h>
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_parent_data adc12_src[] = {
>> +       { .name = "ck_flexgen_46" },
> This is a new driver. Don't use .name here. Instead use .index or .hw
> and if that can't work then use .fw_name.

These parent clocks are managed by a secure world and exposed through SCMI.

If I use .index or .fw_name, do I have to expose 122 clocks in my DT node ?

This will significantly increase the size of the DT file

             clock-names = "hse", "hsi", ..., "ck_scmi_stm500";
             clocks = <&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_HSE>, <&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_HSI>,  
... ,   <&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_STM500>;

>
>> +       { .name = "ck_icn_ls_mcu" },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_parent_data adc3_src[] = {
>> +       { .name = "ck_flexgen_47" },
>> +       { .name = "ck_icn_ls_mcu" },
>> +       { .name = "ck_flexgen_46" },
>> +};
> [...]
>> +static struct clk_stm32_composite ck_ker_usb3pciephy = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_USB3PCIEPHY,
>> +       .mux_id = MUX_USB3PCIEPHY,
>> +       .div_id = NO_STM32_DIV,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS_DATA("ck_ker_usb3pciephy", usb3pciphy_src,
>> +                                           &clk_stm32_composite_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* USB3 DRD */
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_m_usb3dr = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_USB3DR,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_m_usb3dr", "ck_icn_hsl", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_ker_usb2phy2 = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_USB3DR,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_ker_usb2phy2", "ck_flexgen_58", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* USBTC */
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_usbtc = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_USBTC,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_usbtc", "ck_icn_apb4", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
> Please stop using strings to match parents, i.e. don't use CLK_HW_INIT.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_ker_usbtc = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_USBTC,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_ker_usbtc", "ck_flexgen_35", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* VDEC / VENC */
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_vdec = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_VDEC,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_vdec", "ck_icn_apb4", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_venc = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_VENC,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_venc", "ck_icn_apb4", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* VREF */
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_vref = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_VREF,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_vref", "ck_icn_apb3", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* WWDG */
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_wwdg1 = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_WWDG1,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_wwdg1", "ck_icn_apb3", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_stm32_gate ck_icn_p_wwdg2 = {
>> +       .gate_id = GATE_WWDG2,
>> +       .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("ck_icn_p_wwdg2", "ck_icn_ls_mcu", &clk_stm32_gate_ops, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum security_clk {
>> +       SECF_NONE,
> What is the use of this single value enum?

Yes, just a define is enough for the moment. I will have more 
definitions in my next series to introduce

security (clocks could be managed by a secure world or not).

>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct clock_config stm32mp25_clock_cfg[] = {
>> +       STM32_GATE_CFG(CK_BUS_ETH1,             ck_icn_p_eth1,          SECF_NONE),
>> +       STM32_GATE_CFG(CK_BUS_ETH2,             ck_icn_p_eth2,          SECF_NONE),
> [....]
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stm32mp25_match_data[] = {
>> +       {
>> +               .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-rcc",
>> +               .data = &stm32mp25_data,
>> +       },
> One line please:
>
>   	{ .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-rcc", .data = &stm32mp25_data, },

ok

>
>> +       { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32mp25_match_data);
>> +
>> +static int get_clock_deps(struct device *dev)
> What is the explanation for this function?

It 's to manage the dependency with the SCMI clock driver.


>> +{
>> +       static const char * const clock_deps_name[] = {
>> +               "hsi", "hse", "msi", "lsi", "lse",
>> +       };
>> +       int i;
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clock_deps_name); i++) {
>> +               struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> +               clk = of_clk_get_by_name(dev_of_node(dev), clock_deps_name[i]);
>> +               if (IS_ERR(clk))
>> +                       return PTR_ERR(clk);
>> +
>> +               clk_put(clk);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +       void __iomem *base;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       ret = get_clock_deps(dev);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       base = devm_of_iomap(dev, dev->of_node, 0, NULL);
> Use platform device APIs.
>
>> +       if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(base)))
>> +               return PTR_ERR(base);
>> +
>> +       return stm32_rcc_init(dev, stm32mp25_match_data, base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +       struct device_node *child, *np = dev_of_node(dev);
>> +
>> +       for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child)
>> +               of_clk_del_provider(child);
> Add the providers with devm?

ok


>
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_driver = {
>> +       .driver = {
>> +               .name = "stm32mp25_rcc",
>> +               .of_match_table = stm32mp25_match_data,
>> +       },
>> +       .probe = stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_probe,
>> +       .remove = stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_remove,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init stm32mp25_clocks_init(void)
>> +{
>> +       return platform_driver_register(&stm32mp25_rcc_clocks_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +core_initcall(stm32mp25_clocks_init);