[RFC PATCH v1 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-sva: Allocate new ASID from installed_smmus

Michael Shavit mshavit at google.com
Mon Aug 21 02:31:23 PDT 2023


On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 2:38 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 02:16:25AM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> > Pick an ASID that is within the supported range of all SMMUs that the
> > domain is installed to.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit at google.com>
> > ---
>
> This seems like a pretty niche scenario, maybe we should just keep a
> global for the max ASID?
>
> Otherwise we need a code to change the ASID, even for non-SVA domains,
> when the domain is installed in different devices if the current ASID
> is over the instance max..

This RFC took the other easy way out for this problem by rejecting
attaching a domain if its currently assigned ASID/VMID
is out of range when attaching to a new SMMU. But I'm not sure
which of the two options is the right trade-off.
Especially if we move VMID to a global allocator (which I plan to add
for v2), setting a global maximum for VMID of 256 sounds small.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list