[arm:for-next 4/4] arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:324:13: error: static declaration of 'VFP_bounce' follows non-static declaration

[Russell King (Oracle)]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 05:06:03AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git for-next
> head:   f493fedcc3016e46ecbf7ab9490ba4762723efab
> commit: f493fedcc3016e46ecbf7ab9490ba4762723efab [4/4] Merge branch 'devel-stable' into for-next
> config: arm-milbeaut_m10v_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230815/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230815/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:324:13: error: static declaration of 'VFP_bounce' follows non-static declaration
>    static void VFP_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs)
>                ^
>    arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h:105:6: note: previous declaration is here
>    void VFP_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs);
>         ^
>    1 error generated.

I'm guessing this is a conflict between Arnd's patch

ae1f8d793a19 ("ARM: 9304/1: add prototype for function called only from asm")

merged in v6.5-rc1 and Ard's patch, and that part of Arnd's patch
needs to be reverted since VFP_bounce is now static. Agreed?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!