[EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp secure enclave firmware

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/08/2023 13:07, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:08 AM
>> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>; shawnguo at kernel.org;
>> s.hauer at pengutronix.de; kernel at pengutronix.de; clin at suse.com;
>> conor+dt at kernel.org; pierre.gondois at arm.com; Jacky Bai
>> <ping.bai at nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang at nxp.com>; Wei Fang
>> <wei.fang at nxp.com>; Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>; Bough Chen
>> <haibo.chen at nxp.com>; festevam at gmail.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-
>> imx at nxp.com>; davem at davemloft.net; robh+dt at kernel.org;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Gaurav Jain
>> <gaurav.jain at nxp.com>; alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com; Sahil Malhotra
>> <sahil.malhotra at nxp.com>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong at nxp.com>; Varun
>> Sethi <V.Sethi at nxp.com>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp secure
>> enclave firmware
>>
>> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
>> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
>> this email' button
>>
>>
>> On 12/07/2023 14:12, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>> Added support for NXP secure enclave called EdgeLock Enclave firmware
>>> (se-fw) for imx8ulp-evk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
>>> index 3ddc0f3125b3..10ed31974a6f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ sosc: clock-sosc {
>>>               #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>       };
>>>
>>> -     sram at 2201f000 {
>>> +     sram0: sram at 2201f000 {
>>>               compatible = "mmio-sram";
>>>               reg = <0x0 0x2201f000 0x0 0x1000>;
>>>
>>> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@ s4muap: mailbox at 27020000 {
>>>                       #mbox-cells = <2>;
>>>               };
>>>
>>> +             ele_fw: se-fw {
>>> +                     compatible = "fsl,imx-ele";
>>> +                     mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0 &s4muap 1 0>;
>>> +                     mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
>>> +                     fsl,mu-did = <7>;
>>> +                     fsl,mu-id = <2>;
>>> +                     sram-pool = <&sram0>;
>>
>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run `make
>> dtbs_check` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
>> https://www.li/
>> naro.org%2Fblog%2Ftips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-
>> the-devicetree-
>> schema%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cpankaj.gupta%40nxp.com%7Cd13d0b68d01c
>> 4d10d8cb08db83070ed2%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
>> 7C0%7C638247838553225400%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
>> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7
>> C%7C%7C&sdata=pO6dnz4aPqVejRNDR0OU4n04hXebyqgrNKg4DPhahI0%3D
>> &reserved=0
>> for instructions).
> 
> Tested. Before submitting the patch.
> [Pankaj] Accepted.

You really tested that patch? Before I waste my time on proving it was
not, are you 100% sure that you tested that patch and no new warnings
are printed? Or are you just agreeing with me that this time you will test?
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof