[PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add VAR-SOM-MX6 SoM with Custom Board

[James Hilliard]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:26 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:37:39AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> > Add support for Variscite i.MX6Q VAR-SOM-MX6 SoM with Custom Board.
> >
> > Cc: Pierluigi Passaro <pierluigi.p at variscite.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index 2510eaa8906d..76bb098605e7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -385,6 +385,12 @@ properties:
> >            - const: toradex,apalis_imx6q
> >            - const: fsl,imx6q
> >
> > +      - description: i.MX6Q Variscite VAR-SOM-MX6 Boards
> > +        items:
> > +          - const: variscite,mx6customboard
> > +          - const: variscite,var-som-imx6q
> > +          - const: fsl,imx6q
>
> I find it hard to tell what the sort order here is meant to be, but it
> appears to be first by what I.MX processor and then by the board
> compatibles? If so, this is added out of order.

Ordering follows the same pattern as say the "Variscite VAR-SOM-MX8MM
based boards", should it be different?

>
> > +
> >        - description: TQ-Systems TQMa6Q SoM (variant A) on MBa6x
> >          items:
> >            - const: tq,imx6q-mba6x-a
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >