[PATCH v1 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add CSIS DT nodes

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Apr 17 01:15:10 PDT 2023


Hi Marco,

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:01:17AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 23-04-17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 08:50:59AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > > 
> > > your patch LGTM just one nit/idea, please see below.
> > > 
> > > On 23-04-17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Add DT nodes for the two CSI-2 receivers of the i.MX8MP.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
> > > > index 2dd60e3252f3..2a374a4c14a2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
> > > > @@ -1239,6 +1239,66 @@ ldb_lvds_ch1: endpoint {
> > > >  				};
> > > >  			};
> > > >  
> > > > +			mipi_csi_0: csi at 32e40000 {
> > > > +				compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-mipi-csi2", "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-csi2";
> > > > +				reg = <0x32e40000 0x10000>;
> > > > +				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > +				clock-frequency = <500000000>;
> > > > +				clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_APB_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_CAM1_PIX_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_MIPI_PHY1_REF_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_AXI_ROOT>;
> > > > +				clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy", "axi";
> > > > +				assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_CAM1_PIX>;
> > > > +				assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MP_SYS_PLL2_1000M>;
> > > > +				assigned-clock-rates = <500000000>;
> > > > +				power-domains = <&media_blk_ctrl IMX8MP_MEDIABLK_PD_MIPI_CSI2_1>;
> > > > +				status = "disabled";
> > > > +
> > > > +				ports {
> > > > +					#address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +					#size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +
> > > > +					port at 0 {
> > > > +						reg = <0>;
> > > 
> > > If we would add:
> > > 						mipi_csi_0_in: endpoint {};
> > > 
> > > here we could refernce it from overlays/board dts files more easily.
> > 
> > Isn't there an unwritten rule (or consensus) that an endpoint should
> > always have a remote-endpoint property ?
> 
> I don't know if there is one.
> 
> > While ports describe hardware properties of a device and should always
> > be there regardless of connections, endpoints describe connections and
> > I don't think they should be instantiated with a valid
> > remote-endpoint.
> 
> I know, therefore I mentioned it as idea to make it 'easier' to add
> camera nodes.

As a middleground, would it be useful to have a label for the port ?
Something like

	mipi_csi_0: csi at 32e40000 {
		ports {
			mipi_csi_0_port_0: port at 0 {
			};
		};
	};

An overlay could then reference that and create the endpoint. I'm not
entirely sure how useful that would be though, as the overlay would need
to enable the CSI node anyway. Compare

--------
&mipi_csi_0 {
	status = "okay";
};

&mipi_csi_0_port_0 {
	mipi_csi_0_in: endpoint {
		remote-endpoint = <&imx327_out>;
	};
};
--------

with

--------
&mipi_csi_0 {
	status = "okay";

	ports {
		port at 0 {
			mipi_csi_0_in: endpoint {
				remote-endpoint = <&imx327_out>;
			};
		};
	};
};
--------

I have a slight preference for the latter as it groups all the CSI0 data
in a single overlay target, but if the former is generally preferred,
I'm fine with that too.

> > > > +					};
> > > > +
> > > > +					port at 1 {
> > > > +						reg = <1>;
> > > > +					};
> > > > +				};
> > > > +			};
> > > > +
> > > > +			mipi_csi_1: csi at 32e50000 {
> > > > +				compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-mipi-csi2", "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-csi2";
> > > > +				reg = <0x32e50000 0x10000>;
> > > > +				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > +				clock-frequency = <266000000>;
> > > > +				clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_APB_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_CAM2_PIX_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_MIPI_PHY1_REF_ROOT>,
> > > > +					 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_AXI_ROOT>;
> > > > +				clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy", "axi";
> > > > +				assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_CAM2_PIX>;
> > > > +				assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MP_SYS_PLL2_1000M>;
> > > > +				assigned-clock-rates = <266000000>;
> > > > +				power-domains = <&media_blk_ctrl IMX8MP_MEDIABLK_PD_MIPI_CSI2_2>;
> > > > +				status = "disabled";
> > > > +
> > > > +				ports {
> > > > +					#address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +					#size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +
> > > > +					port at 0 {
> > > > +						reg = <0>;
> > > > +					};
> > > > +
> > > > +					port at 1 {
> > > > +						reg = <1>;
> > > > +					};
> > > > +				};
> > > > +			};
> > > > +
> > > >  			pcie_phy: pcie-phy at 32f00000 {
> > > >  				compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-pcie-phy";
> > > >  				reg = <0x32f00000 0x10000>;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list